According to Naiya̅yikas we ascertain the relation of universal concomitance between x and y :  (A) We can determine the relation only if we can determine the relation of essential identity between x and y   (B) By perceiving that in all cases the presence of x is accompanied by the presence of y  (C) We can determine the relation only if we can determine the relation of cause and effect between x and y  (D) By not perceiving any instance where the presence of x is not accompanied by the presence of y or vice-versa.  Choose the correct answer from the options given below : 

According to Naiya̅yikas we ascertain the relation of universal concomitance between x and y :  (A) We can determine the relation only if we can determine the relation of essential identity between x and y   (B) By perceiving that in all cases the presence of x is accompanied by the presence of y  (C) We can determine the relation only if we can determine the relation of cause and effect between x and y  (D) By not perceiving any instance where the presence of x is not accompanied by the presence of y or vice-versa.  Choose the correct answer from the options given below :  Correct Answer (B) and (D) only

Vyapti is an invariable, unconditional, and universal relationship between an inferential argument's middle word and major term.

Key Points

  • Knowledge of an object is gained from prior knowledge of a sign or mark in an inference.
  • The past knowledge is due to the minor word containing the universal relation between the major and middle terms.
  • The inference is based on the unconditional universal concomitance between the middle term and the major term.  
  • the middle term indicates the existence of the major term and is found in the minor term or "paksa,". 
  • The main and minor premises must both be true for the inference to be valid;
  • Naiya̅yikas school on the question of How is Vyapti-universal concomitance between the mark and the inferred property?
  • They assert that by perceiving that in all cases the presence of x is accompanied by the presence of y and not perceiving any instance to the contrary. 

Therefore, (B) and (D) are correct statements. 

Additional Information

  • On the subject of inference, the Naiya̅yikas school considers knowledge of vyapti to be the cause of successful inference.
  • Internal perception does not allow for the perception of all instances of the middle and major terms, nor does it allow for the knowledge of vyapti.

Related Questions

Given below are two statements Statement I: Identity diffusion occurs when individuals explore any option or commit to any actions.    Statement II: Identity foreclosure is commitment without exploration. In light of the above statements, choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below