Two statements are given followed by two conclusions as responses. You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusion(s) can definitely be drawn from the given statements. Statements: There was a time when the world believed that women cannot be as good as men due to the gender stereotypes that existed in the society. Marie Curie turned out to be an excellent scientist and was the first person to win the Nobel Prize twice. Conclusions: Marie Curie broke the gender stereotypes by turning out to be better than men. Marie Curie wanted to win the Nobel Prize.
Two statements are given followed by two conclusions as responses. You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusion(s) can definitely be drawn from the given statements. Statements: There was a time when the world believed that women cannot be as good as men due to the gender stereotypes that existed in the society. Marie Curie turned out to be an excellent scientist and was the first person to win the Nobel Prize twice. Conclusions: Marie Curie broke the gender stereotypes by turning out to be better than men. Marie Curie wanted to win the Nobel Prize. Correct Answer Only Conclusion I follows.
The first statement focuses on the gender stereotypes and the then existing beliefs while the second statement presents Marie Curie as a woman who proved those stereotypes wrong. Conclusion I can be drawn from the given statements as it is related to both the above statements and clearly emphasises that Marie Curie broke the gender stereotypes but conclusion II provides us with a desire of Marie Curie that we do not know. Therefore, only conclusion I can be drawn from the given statements and option 1 is the correct answer.
মোঃ আরিফুল ইসলাম
Feb 20, 2025