Two statements are given followed by two conclusions as responses. You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusion(s) can definitely be drawn from the given statements. Statements: There was a time when the world believed that women cannot be as good as men due to the gender stereotypes that existed in the society. Marie Curie turned out to be an excellent scientist and was the first person to win the Nobel Prize twice. Conclusions: Marie Curie broke the gender stereotypes by turning out to be better than men. Marie Curie wanted to win the Nobel Prize.

Two statements are given followed by two conclusions as responses. You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusion(s) can definitely be drawn from the given statements. Statements: There was a time when the world believed that women cannot be as good as men due to the gender stereotypes that existed in the society. Marie Curie turned out to be an excellent scientist and was the first person to win the Nobel Prize twice. Conclusions: Marie Curie broke the gender stereotypes by turning out to be better than men. Marie Curie wanted to win the Nobel Prize. Correct Answer Only Conclusion I follows.

The first statement focuses on the gender stereotypes and the then existing beliefs while the second statement presents Marie Curie as a woman who proved those stereotypes wrong. Conclusion I can be drawn from the given statements as it is related to both the above statements and clearly emphasises that Marie Curie broke the gender stereotypes but conclusion II provides us with a desire of Marie Curie that we do not know. Therefore, only conclusion I can be drawn from the given statements and option 1 is the correct answer.

Related Questions

Two statements are followed by three Conclusions I, II and III. You have to consider the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements and indicate your answer accordingly. Statements: I. One of the biggest acquisitions in the Indian patient-care industry, the Rs. 4,500-crore Fortis-IHH deal could intensify competitive intensity in the space, with declines Friday in the shares of Apollo Hospitals, Healthcare Global, Max India and Narayana Hrudayalaya pointing to potential challenges for the incumbents.  II. After the completion of the deal, the IHH-Fortis group of hospitals will be among the biggest in the country, competing directly with some of the large listed hospital chains. The BSE Healthcare index also fell Friday, with hospital stocks at the vanguard of the downward journey.  Conclusions: I. Hospitals will be challenged as they will have to face someone like IHH, which has deep pockets and will be going into markets where they are present. II. Shares of Apollo, currently the largest hospital chain in India, fell more than 2%, closing at Rs. 975, followed by Max India that lost by 2.40%. III. Both are direct competitors of Fortis, Narayana and Healthcare Global also fell after the buyout announcement.