Given below are two statements : Statement I:- The fallacy of contradictory middle (viruddha) occurs in an argument when the middle term is found both where the major is found and where it is not found. Statement II :- The fallacy of contradictory middle (viruddha) is committed in an argument when the middle term is found only where major term is absent. In the light of the above statements, choose the correct answer from the options given below:
Given below are two statements : Statement I:- The fallacy of contradictory middle (viruddha) occurs in an argument when the middle term is found both where the major is found and where it is not found. Statement II :- The fallacy of contradictory middle (viruddha) is committed in an argument when the middle term is found only where major term is absent. In the light of the above statements, choose the correct answer from the options given below: Correct Answer Statement I is false but Statement II is true
the correct answer is Statement I is false but Statement II is true
- There are five characteristics of a middle term
- It must be present in the minor term (paksadharmata); e.g., smoke must be present in the hill.
- It must be present in all positive instances in which the major terms is present; e.g., smoke must be present in the kitchen where fire exists.(sapaksasattva).
- It must be absent in all negative instances in which the major terms is absent; e.g., smoke must be absent in the lake in which fire does not exist.(vipaksasattva).
- It must be non-incompatible with the minor term; e.g., it must not prove the coolness of fire (abadhita).
- It must be qualified by the absence of counteracting reasons which lead to a contradictory conclusion; e.g., ‘the fact of being caused’ should not be used to prove the ‘eternality’ of sound (aviruddha)
Key Points
Statement I: The fallacy of contradictory middle (viruddha) occurs in an argument when the middle term is found both where the major is found and where it is not found
- Viruddha Fallacy:
- According to Jain school, contradictory (Viruddha) hetvabhasa is a concomitance with the opposite of the major term.
- It proves not the existence but the non-existence of the major in the minor.
- For instance, the sound is not perishable because it is caused.
- In this statement the hetu caused is not concomitantly related with not perishability but to its opposite.
- Therefore it is viruddha hetvabhasa.
Hence statement I is false
Statement II: The fallacy of contradictory middle (viruddha) is committed in an argument when the middle term is found only where the major term is absent.
- Viruddha Fallacy:
- It is the contradictory middle
- The middle term, instead of being pervaded by the presence of the major term is pervaded by the absence of the major term.
- Instead of proving the existence of the major term in the minor term, it proves its non-existence therein;
- e.g., ‘sound is eternal because it is produced’.
- Here ‘Produced’, instead of proving the eternity of sound, proves its non-eternity.
- Here it is not an inferential fallacy instead it is fallacy of self-contradiction.
Hence statement II is correct
thus we conclude that Statement I is false but Statement II is true