Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Related Questions

Cis-Golgi network (CGN) is closer to the endoplasmic reticulum than the trans-Golgi network (TGN).
Which of the following factors is not responsible for the maintenance of Quantum Hall Effect (QHE) in graphene at high temperatures?
In what way is graphene’s Quantum Hall Effect (QHE) different from the conventional quantum hall effect?
In making decision about important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between "Strong" arguments and "Weak arguments". "Strong" arguments must be both important and directly related to the question. "Weak" arguments may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspects of the question. Question given below is followed by two arguments numbered a), b). You have to decide which of the argument(s) is/are "Strong" and indicate your answer accordingly. Statement: Should the Government close Telugu medium schools? Arguments: a) Yes, this will help the Government to save money on salaries to teachers. Telugu medium schools?
Match the following two sets given below. Set - I consists of terms related to specific deviations and Set - II consists of resultant impairments. Set-I (Terms denoting nature of deviations) Set-II (Resultant Impairments) (a) Cerebral Palsy  (i) Problems related to reading words   and letter (b) Congenital Cytomegalovirus (ii) Characterised by rapid, involuntary movements of eyes which make it difficult to focus on objects and causes dizziness (c) Dyslexia (iii) Disorder related to movements and posture (d) Nystagmus (iv) Herpes - related viral infection causes hearing loss   (v) Disorder related to farsightedness
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a Strong argument is and which a weak argument is. Statement: Should fast food consumption be totally banned in our country? Argument: I: Yes. It is expensive and most of the people in our country cannot afford it. II: No. Not everything should be banned in a democratic country like ours. 
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a Strong argument is and which a weak argument is. Statement: Is privatizing all the schools in India the best solution to attain 100% literacy rate? Arguments: I. Yes, private institutes are responsible and dedicated towards their work. II. No, education will become unaffordable for poor people.
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a Strong argument is and which a weak argument is. Statement: Should schools in India have only one board of education? Arguments: I) Yes, it will create uniformity and equality in education. II) No, it will reduce chances of either quality education or/and may affect literacy rate.
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a strong argument and which is a weak argument. Statement: A healthy diet and exercise are important for a healthy lifestyle. Arguments: I: Yes, eating healthy and being more physically active helps in maintaining a healthy weight. II: No, besides these two components, there are other components too which lead to a better lifestyle.
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘Strong’ arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ‘strong’ argument is and which a ‘weak’ argument is. Statement: Is capital punishment for heinous crime against women justified?  Argument: I: Yes, this harsh punishment will decrease the crimes against women in the society. II: No, the fear of death is not the solution for such heinous crimes.