Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a Strong argument is and which a weak argument is. Statement: Should fast food consumption be totally banned in our country? Argument: I: Yes. It is expensive and most of the people in our country cannot afford it. II: No. Not everything should be banned in a democratic country like ours. 

In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a Strong argument is and which a weak argument is. Statement: Should fast food consumption be totally banned in our country? Argument: I: Yes. It is expensive and most of the people in our country cannot afford it. II: No. Not everything should be banned in a democratic country like ours.  Correct Answer Only argument II is strong

Argument I: Yes. It is expensive and most of the people in our country cannot afford it.

The cost of any consumable thing cannot be a reason for a ban.

Argument II: No. Not everything should be banned in a democratic country like ours. 

As, the restriction of diet of people will be a misuse of basic human rights.

Hence, only argument II is strong.

Related Questions

In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘Strong’ arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below if followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ‘strong’ argument is and which a ‘weak’ argument is. Statement: Should banks provide special loans to farmers? Arguments: I. Yes, as with that amount the farmer would be able to afford modern equipment’s which will increase his earnings. II. No, because people may take advantage of this, even those who can afford to pay may not.
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below are followed by two arguments each numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the two arguments is the strong argument and which is the weak argument. Statement: Should alcohol be banned in India? Arguments: Yes. Drinking alcohol is not ethically right. No. Banning alcohol would only lead to illegal consumption and raise the prices of the commodity without actually affecting its consumption.
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘Strong’ arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below if followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ‘strong’ argument is and which a ‘weak’ argument is. Statement: Should minimum deposits be banned to open an account in a bank? Arguments: I. Yes, because people who aren’t making enough money can also open a bank account to save their earnings. II. No, because bank has to pay overhead to run branches, maintain accounts and more thus requires minimum deposits.
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below are followed by two arguments each numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the two arguments is the strong argument and which is the weak argument. Statement: Should higher education be made compulsory in India? Arguments: I. Yes. Higher education makes people more skilled and improves their chances of succeeding in their desired fields. II. No. Pursuing higher education is a choice made by an individual and making it compulsory would take away the person’s right of making his own career decisions.
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below are followed by two arguments each numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the two arguments is the strong argument and which is the weak argument. Statement: Should the Indian Government withdraw the subsidies on LPG cylinders considering a portion of the population can afford to buy unsubsidised cylinders? Arguments: Yes. Subsidising cylinders leads to its misuse. By not giving subsidies on cylinders, the Government can save a part of its income and spend it on other more productive uses. No. Withdrawing subsidies on cylinders would make them too expensive for the poor and the middle class income groups and they would eventually turn to unsustainable means for household uses leading to pollution and ill health.
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below are followed by two arguments each numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the two arguments is the strong argument and which is the weak argument. Statement: Should water be privatised in India? Arguments: I. Yes. Private sectors are more efficient than public sector which would lead to improved water distribution. II. No. Privatisation will make distribution of water profit centric which would increase the cost of water. Not everyone would be able to afford water at high prices.
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘Strong’ arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below if followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ‘strong’ argument is and which a ‘weak’ argument is. Statement: Prohibiting the usage of artificial food colours in food items is correct? Arguments: I. Yes, as the chemicals used in these artificial colours would cause many health issues to humans if consumed. II. No, because by using those it makes food look more attractive and appealing.
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘Strong’ arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ‘strong’ argument is and which a ‘weak’ argument is. Statement: Should all vaccines be made free? Arguments: I. Yes. There are many deadly diseases and lower classes of society cannot afford getting vaccinated. II. No. Many vaccines are quite costly. Subsidising them is enough.  
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘Strong’ arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ‘strong’ argument is and which a ‘weak’ argument is. Statement: Should social networking sites be banned permanently? Arguments: I. Yes. People can always talk on phone. II. No. They are a good medium to connect with people.  
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below are followed by two arguments each numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the two arguments is the strong argument and which is the weak argument. Statement: Should the content on Internet be completely censored? Arguments: Yes. People might use Internet to facilitate terrorist activities or to provoke people and communities against the Government or the other communities. No. The content on Internet should be censored up to a limit, not completely as Internet is also the place where people can freely express their discontent or opinions and spread ideas which are informative for the masses.