A dying declaration under Section 32 of the Evidence Act is admissible in evidence-

Choice the correct propositions:
1. Evidence of fingerprint expert is substantive evidence.
2. Evidence of fingerprint expert can be used only to corroborate some items of substantive evidence which are otherwise on record.
3. Evidence of fingerprint expert is not substantive evidence.
4. Evidence of fingerprint expert is admissible in all circumstances as expert evidence.

A

1 and 2 are true

B

2 and 3 are true

C

3 and 4 are true

D

2 and 4 are true

Statement of an injured person is recorded as dying declaration, however he survives. His Statement is admissible under which section of the Evidence Act?

A

Section 32

B

Section 60

C

Section 85

D

Section 157

Evidences are adduced by the parties to the suit about the 'character'. As per the provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, which of the following is/are correct?
1. Evidence of the character in civil proceedings is irrelevant and inadmissible generally.
2. The character evidence is admissible if it affects the amount of damages which he ought to receive.
3. The character evidence is admissible in so far as such character appears from facts otherwise relevant.
Select the correct answer:

A

1 only

B

1 and 2 only

C

2 and 3 only

D

1, 2 and 3

A dying declaration is relevant evidence under section 32 of the Evidence Act notwithstanding it being hearsay evidence, because-

A

A statement by a person as to the cause of his death is grated in law as a solemn statement

B

If a person is dead and anything said by the person as to the cause of death is relevant, since the dead person cannot be brought beforethe court to testify, necessity makes it inevitable to admit said statement

C

Because it is believed that a person would not meet his maker with lies in the mouth

D

Because society owes a duty to dead persons to give them justice

A group of 74 students of Class XI went on picnic. The number of students who went on picnic by each section is as follows: Section A = 15 Section B = 24 Section C = 15 Section D = 20 5 students from Section A spent as much as 4 students from Section B. 12 Section B students spent as much as 9 Section C students and 6 Section C students spent as much as 8 Section D student. If every student of a particular section spent the same amount and all the students spent Rs. 23,370 altogether, find the amount spent by each student of Section D?

A

Rs. 307.50

B

Rs. 410

C

Rs. 246.50

D

Rs. 369

A 'Dying Declaration' to be admissible under Indian Evidence Act must be made before

A

Magistrate

B

Police Officer

C

Doctor or Private person

D

Magistrate, Police Officer, Doctor or Private person

The principle on which a dying declaration is admissible under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 is indicated in the legal maxim.

A

Actori incumbit onus probandi

B

Nemo moriturus proesumitur mentiri

C

Dormiunt leges aliquando, munquam moriuntur

D

Fatetur facinus qui judicium fugit

Under Indian Evidence Act the dying declaration is not admissible if

A

It relates to cause of action

B

It relates to any transaction of death

C

The person making the statement was not competent in the opinion of the court

D

None of the above

For dying declaration to be admissible in evidence which one of the following is not necessary?

A

That it should relate to the cause of death of the person making

B

That the person making the statement was under the expectation of death

C

That it relates to the circumstances of the transaction with resulted in his death

D

All of the above

Assertion (A): A dying declaration is admissible in evidence.
Reason (R): Its admissibility is founded upon the principle of necessity

A

Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A

B

Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A

C

A is true but R is false

D

A is false but R is true

A dying declaration under Section 32 of the Evidence Act is admissible in evidence-

Related Questions