Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Choice the correct propositions:
1. Evidence of fingerprint expert is substantive evidence.
2. Evidence of fingerprint expert can be used only to corroborate some items of substantive evidence which are otherwise on record.
3. Evidence of fingerprint expert is not substantive evidence.
4. Evidence of fingerprint expert is admissible in all circumstances as expert evidence.

Choice the correct propositions:
1. Evidence of fingerprint expert is substantive evidence.
2. Evidence of fingerprint expert can be used only to corroborate some items of substantive evidence which are otherwise on record.
3. Evidence of fingerprint expert is not substantive evidence.
4. Evidence of fingerprint expert is admissible in all circumstances as expert evidence. Correct Answer 2 and 4 are true

Related Questions

Five friends wanted to go on holiday together to one nearby village, but they found it difficult to decide where to go. Jai and Mano both wanted to go to Pane, with Fene as their second choice. Kali wanted to go to Make, while Lily's first choice was Gute and Naz's was Tembe. Naz and Kali both put Fene as their second choice, while Lily gave it as her third choice, preferring Tembe as her second choice. Kali and Mano put Tembe as their third choice. Jai's third choice was Gute and Naz's was Make. They agreed to allocate three points for a 1st choice, two points for a 2nd choice and one point for a 3rd choice. The friends decided that they would not go anywhere which was not someone's first choice. Select the place they did go for holiday. 
Given below is a word, followed by three sentences which consist of that word. Identify the sentence(s) which best express(es) the meaning of the word. Choose option 5 ‘None of these’ if the word is not suitable in any of the sentences. Corroborate A. Recent research seems to corroborate his theory. B. Employment trends corroborate the dismal economic picture. C. There was no one to corroborate her story about the disturbance in the lounge.
Evidences are adduced by the parties to the suit about the 'character'. As per the provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, which of the following is/are correct?
1. Evidence of the character in civil proceedings is irrelevant and inadmissible generally.
2. The character evidence is admissible if it affects the amount of damages which he ought to receive.
3. The character evidence is admissible in so far as such character appears from facts otherwise relevant.
Select the correct answer:
If a maker of dying declaration survives, his statement can be used under Indian Evidence Act, 1872:
1. As substantive evidence
2. To corroborate the testimony of maker if examined
3. To contradict the testimony of maker if examined
4. Cannot be used at all
Two statements are given followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Comments: All rulers are machines. Some machines are costly items. Conclusions: I. Some rulers are costly items. II. Some costly items are machines. III. All costly items are machines.
In the question given below are two conclusions followed by five statements. You have to choose the correct set of statements that logically satisfies conclusions. Conclusions: I. Some Star are Moon II. Some Sun are not Mars Statements: I. Some Sun are Moon, Some Moon are star and No star is Mars. II. Some Sun are Moon, All Moon are Star and No Star is Mars. III. All Sun are Moon, All Moon are Star and Some Star are Mars. IV. All Sun are Moon, Some Moon are Star and No Star is Mars. V. Some Sun are Moon, Some Moon are Star and No Moon is Mars.
In which of the following cases the Supreme Court held that First information Report (FIR) was not substantive evidence and could only be used to corroborate its maker?
A college/university teacher plans to test his/her substantive research hypothesis in a major project. Which of the following statements are considered relevant in this regard? A. Substantive research hypothesis has to clearly specify the relationship among variables B. Research hypothesis may be directed at finding out differential effects or relationships C. Null hypothesis should be formulated beforehend D. There is direct support available for testing the substantive research hypothesis E. The final decision on the research hypothesis may be reached indirectly by deciding the fate of the Null hypothesis Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
In the below question, some statements are given. You have to take the given statements true even if they appear to be at variance with commonly known facts, and then decide which of conclusions logically follows from the given statements. For each question, mark out an appropriate answer choice that you think is correct. Statements: All animals are birds. Some birds are dogs. Some dogs are jugs. No jug is bug. Conclusions: 1) Some birds are animals. 2) Some dogs are animals. 3) Some dogs are not bugs. 4) Some dogs are not animals.
Below are given four statements followed by four conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they appear to be at variance with commonly known facts, and then decide which of conclusions logically follows from the given statements. For each question, mark out an appropriate answer choice that you think is correct. Statements: Some wings are large. All large are birds. Some birds are kites. Some kites are not big. Conclusions: I. Some wings are birds. II. Some kites are birds. III. Some birds are large. IV. All wings can be large.