Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

In which of the following cases the Supreme Court held that First information Report (FIR) was not substantive evidence and could only be used to corroborate its maker?

In which of the following cases the Supreme Court held that First information Report (FIR) was not substantive evidence and could only be used to corroborate its maker? Correct Answer C. Magesh v. State of Karnaiaka, AIR 2010 SC 2768

Related Questions

Choice the correct propositions:
1. Evidence of fingerprint expert is substantive evidence.
2. Evidence of fingerprint expert can be used only to corroborate some items of substantive evidence which are otherwise on record.
3. Evidence of fingerprint expert is not substantive evidence.
4. Evidence of fingerprint expert is admissible in all circumstances as expert evidence.
The propositions are
1. Delay and dispatch of FIR (First Information Report) is not the circumstance which can throw out prosecution case in its entirety.
2. Delay and despatch of FIR (First Information Report) is a circumstance which can throw out the prosecution case in its entirety.
3. The extraordinary delay in sending the FIR (First Information Report) is a circumstance which provides a legitimate basis for suspecting that the FIR (First Information Report) was recorded much later than the stated date and hour, affording sufficient time to the prosecution to introduce improvement,
Which of the following is correct in respect of the aforesaid preposition?
The propositions are:
1. Delay in despatch of the First information Report (FIR) is not a circumstance which can throw out the prosecution case in its entirety.
2. Delay in despatch of the First information Report (FIR) is a circumstance which can throw out the prosecution case in its entirety.
3. The extra-ordinary delay in sending the First information Report (FIR) is a circumstance which provides a legitimate basis for suspecting that the First information Report (FIR) was recorded much later than the stated date and hour, affording sufficient time to the prosecution to introduce improvements.
Which of the following is correct in respect of the aforesaid proposition
If a maker of dying declaration survives, his statement can be used under Indian Evidence Act, 1872:
1. As substantive evidence
2. To corroborate the testimony of maker if examined
3. To contradict the testimony of maker if examined
4. Cannot be used at all
Given below is a word, followed by three sentences which consist of that word. Identify the sentence(s) which best express(es) the meaning of the word. Choose option 5 ‘None of these’ if the word is not suitable in any of the sentences. Corroborate A. Recent research seems to corroborate his theory. B. Employment trends corroborate the dismal economic picture. C. There was no one to corroborate her story about the disturbance in the lounge.
Which of the following statements are correct? Answer by using the code given below:
1. Persons in Govt/Judicial service need not resign to participate in District judge selection process held in "Vijay Kumar Misra and another v. High Court of Judicature at Patna" by the Supreme Court of India
2. The Supreme Court of India held in S. Kazi v. Muslim Education Society that " All Tribunals are not necessary parties to the proceedings where legality of its orders challenged"
3. The Supreme Court of India observed in Cardanumom Marketing Corporation and others v. State of Kerala and others that Social Security to the legal profession becomes an essential part of legal system
4. The Supreme Court of India held in 'Union of India v. Rajasthan High Court and others that High Court judges are exempted from Airport frisking.
On Comparing Indian and American Supreme Courts which one of the following statements is NOT true? Indian Supreme Courts original jurisdiction is confined to federal cases. Indian Supreme Court appellate jurisdiction is confined to constitutional cases only. American Supreme Court has a very wide discretion to grant special leave to appeal in any matter against the judgement of any court or tribunal (except military). American Supreme Court has no advisory jurisdiction.
A five-judge bench of the Supreme Court passes judgment in a matter. In a later case before a high court, a party presents the Supreme Court judgment as a binding authority. The opposing party claims that the high court is not bound by the Supreme Court's judgment because relevant provisions of law were not brought to the notice of the Supreme Court in that case. Which of the following is most correct in this case?
Principle: Article 141 of the Constitution provides that the law declared by the Supreme Court is binding on all courts within the territory of India.
Consider the following statements regarding the First Information Report. 1. It is compulsory to register an FIR when a victim gives information about a cognizable offence. 2. FIR can be registered without oral testimony of the complainant. 3. The complainant has only a legal right to get a free copy of the FIR from the police. Which of the following statements given above is/are correct?
The constitution of India has made which of the following provisions to safeguard and ensure the independence and impartial functioning of the Supreme court? 1. The salaries, allowances, privileges, leave and pension of the judges of the Supreme Court cannot be changed to their disadvantage after their appointment even during a financial emergency. 2. The retired judges of the Supreme Court are prohibited from pleading or acting in any Court or before any authority within the territory of India. 3. The Parliament is not authorised to curtail the jurisdiction and powers of the Supreme Court. 4. The judges of the Supreme Court are provided with the Security of Tenure. Select the correct answer using the correct code given below: