Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

A dying declaration is relevant evidence under section 32 of the Evidence Act notwithstanding it being hearsay evidence, because-

A dying declaration is relevant evidence under section 32 of the Evidence Act notwithstanding it being hearsay evidence, because- Correct Answer Because it is believed that a person would not meet his maker with lies in the mouth

Related Questions

Admissions and confessions are-
1. Exception to the hearsay evidence
2. Part of hearsay evidence
3. Form relevant evidence
4. Admitted in evidence on proof
Select the correct answer:
A statement to become relevant under Section 32(1) of the Indian Evidence Act as dying declaration should have been made under which of the following circumstances?
Under the Evidence Act facts not otherwise relevant are relevant . . . . . . . .
1. If they are significant
2. If they are inconsistent with any fact in issue or relevant fact
3. If they make the existence or nonexistence of any fact in issue or relevant fact highly probable or improbable
Choose correct answer:
A group of 74 students of Class XI went on picnic. The number of students who went on picnic by each section is as follows: Section A = 15 Section B = 24 Section C = 15 Section D = 20 5 students from Section A spent as much as 4 students from Section B. 12 Section B students spent as much as 9 Section C students and 6 Section C students spent as much as 8 Section D student. If every student of a particular section spent the same amount and all the students spent Rs. 23,370 altogether, find the amount spent by each student of Section D?
A clause beginning with 'notwithstanding anything contained in this Act or in some particular provisions in the Act or in some particular Acts or in any law for the time being in force', is some times appended to a section in the beginning, with a view to give the enacting part of the section in case of conflict, an overriding effect over the provision or Act mentioned in that clause. Such a clause is called:
A dying declaration under Section 32 of the Evidence Act is admissible in evidence-
Last year, there were three sections in a competitive exam. Out of them 33 students cleared the cut-off in Section A, 34 students cleared the cut-off in Section B and 32 students cleared the cut-off in Section C. 10 students cleared the cut-off in section A and section B, 9 cleared the cut-off in section B and section C and 8 cleared the cut-off in section A and section C. The number of students who cleared only one section was equal and was 21 for each section. How many students cleared all the three sections?
Which of the following section of Evidence Act recognize the principle that "Hearsay evidence is no evidence"?
Consider following facts regarding effect of declaration made under section 34 of Specific Relief Act:-
1. Declaration is binding on the parties to the suit and persons claiming through them respectively.
2. Declaration binds all those persons who have knowledge of the suit and knowingly they do not become parties.
Consider the following statements in respect of the offence of robbery:
1. Causing fear of death may be relevant
2. Causing hurt may be relevant
3. Causing fear of hurt may be relevant
4. Causing wrongful restraint may be relevant
Which of the statements given above are correct?