In the question below are given two statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Some Harsh are Ampere Some Star are not Harsh Some Attackers are not Ampere Conclusions: I. Some Attackers are not Star II. A lot of Ampere is Harsh III. Some Attackers are Star

In the question below are given two statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Some Harsh are Ampere Some Star are not Harsh Some Attackers are not Ampere Conclusions: I. Some Attackers are not Star II. A lot of Ampere is Harsh III. Some Attackers are Star Correct Answer Only II follows

The least possible Venn diagram for the given statements is as follows,

[ alt="F1 Puja Madhuri 16.06.2021 D23" src="//storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/21/06/F1_Puja_Madhuri_16.06.2021_D23.png" style="width: 149px; height: 116px;">

Conclusions:

I. Some attackers are not star → False (there is no direct relation between Attackers and Star. It is not definite. So, It is false)

II. A lot of Ampere is Harsh → True (A lot of consideration as Some. So, it is true)

III. Some Attackers are Star → False (there is no direct relation between Attackers and Star. It is not definite. So, It is false)

Hence, Only II follows.

Related Questions