In the question below are given three statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Some Dogs are Friends. All Friends are Snakes. No Teacher is a Friend. Conclusions: I. Some Dogs are Snakes. II. All Dogs are Snakes. III. Some Teachers are Dogs.
In the question below are given three statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Some Dogs are Friends. All Friends are Snakes. No Teacher is a Friend. Conclusions: I. Some Dogs are Snakes. II. All Dogs are Snakes. III. Some Teachers are Dogs. Correct Answer Only I follows
The least possible Venn diagram for the given statements is as follows
[ alt="Federal Bank PO Ashish 1" src="//storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/18/08/Federal%20Bank%20PO_Ashish_1.PNG" style="height:185px; width:197px">
Conclusions:
I. Some Dogs are Snakes → follows.
II. All Dogs are Snakes → not follows (It is possible but not definite).
III. Some Teachers are Dogs → not follows (It is possible but not definite).
Hence, only conclusion I follows.