In the question below are given two statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Some camphor are rubidium All bauxite is titanium All rubidium is bauxite Conclusions: I. Some camphor are bauxite II. All bauxite are rubidium III. All bauxite is camphor
In the question below are given two statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Some camphor are rubidium All bauxite is titanium All rubidium is bauxite Conclusions: I. Some camphor are bauxite II. All bauxite are rubidium III. All bauxite is camphor Correct Answer Only I follows
The least possible Venn diagram for the given statements is as follows,
[ alt="Coded logic syllogism Rimpa rework 25 Qs.docx 11" src="//storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/19/12/Coded_logic_syllogism_Rimpa_rework_25_Qs.docx%2011.png" style="width: 360px; height: 140px;">
I. Some camphor are bauxite → True (It is definite)
II. All bauxite are rubidium → False (It is not definite)
III. All bauxite is camphor → False (It is not definite)
Hence, only I follows.