In the question below are given two statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Some camphor are rubidium All bauxite is titanium All rubidium is bauxite Conclusions: I. All rubidium is titanium II. Some titanium is a camphor

In the question below are given two statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Some camphor are rubidium All bauxite is titanium All rubidium is bauxite Conclusions: I. All rubidium is titanium II. Some titanium is a camphor Correct Answer Both I and II follow.

The least possible Venn diagram for the given statements is as follows,

[ alt="Coded logic syllogism Rimpa rework 25 Qs.docx 12" src="//storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/19/12/Coded_logic_syllogism_Rimpa_rework_25_Qs.docx%2012.png" style="width: 359px; height: 141px;">

I. All rubidium is titanium → True (It is definite)

II. Some titanium is a camphor →True (It is definite)

Hence, Both I and II follow.

Related Questions