In the question below are given two statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Some harsh are ampere No star is Harsh. No attackers are ampere Conclusions: I. Some harsh are star II. Some attackers are not harsh III. No star is attacker

In the question below are given two statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Some harsh are ampere No star is Harsh. No attackers are ampere Conclusions: I. Some harsh are star II. Some attackers are not harsh III. No star is attacker Correct Answer None follows

The least possible Venn diagram for the given statements is as follows,

[ alt="Coded logic syllogism Rimpa rework 25 Qs.docx 14" src="//storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/19/12/Coded_logic_syllogism_Rimpa_rework_25_Qs.docx%2014.png" style="width: 182px; height: 124px;">

I. Some harsh are star → False 

II. Some attackers are not harsh → False (It is not definite)

III. No star is attacker → False (It is not definite)

Hence, none of the conclusions follows.

Related Questions