1. M. C. Mehta vs Union of India
  2. Subhash Kumar vs State of Bihar
  3. Samit Mehta vs Union of India
  4. Art of living case on Yamuna Flood Plains
8 views

1 Answers

Option 2 : Subhash Kumar vs State of Bihar

The correct answer is Subhash Kumar vs the State of Bihar.

  • Supreme Court held that the right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution is a fundamental right and includes the right to free water and free air from pollution for the full enjoyment of life in the case of Subhash Kumar vs the State of Bihar.
  • The Court has stated that Article 21 includes the enjoyment of pollutant-free water and air for full enjoyment of life as far as the release of industrial pollution into rivers is concerned.

 Thus, we can say that the above statements are correct.

8 views

Related Questions