Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

  1. Minerva Mills case
  2. Chandra Kumar case
  3. Kesavananda Bharati case
  4. Coelho case
5 views

1 Answers

Option 2 : Chandra Kumar case

The correct Answer is Chandra Kumar case.

L.Chandra Kumar case:

  • In the Chandra Kumar case, the Supreme Court ruled that the writ jurisdiction of both the high court and the Supreme Court constitute a part of the basic structure of the Constitution.
  • It cannot be ousted or excluded even by way of an amendment to the Constitution.

 

No. Name of the Case Elements
1. Minerva Mills case (1980)
  • Harmony and balance between fundamental rights and directive principles
  • Limited power of the parliament to amend and the constitution
  • Judicial review.
2.

Kesavananda Bharati case (1973)
  • Supremacy of the Constitution
  • Separation of powers between the legislature, executive and the judiciary
3. I.R. Coelho case (2007)
  • Rule of law
  • Separation of powers
  • Judicial review
  • Principle of equality
5 views

Related Questions

In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘Strong’ arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ‘strong’ argument is and which a ‘weak’ argument is. Statement: Should capital punishment be removed Arguments: I. Yes. No person has the right to take someone else’s life. II. No. There are some gruesome cases and capital punishment should be given in these rarest of rare cases.  ?
1 Answers 4 Views