Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

  1. laid down in the Constitution of India
  2. specified in The Representation of the People Act, 1951
  3. enjoined by the Supreme Court
  4. agreed through a voluntary agreement among the recognized political parties
4 views

1 Answers

Option 2 : specified in The Representation of the People Act, 1951

The Representation of People Act, 1951 is an act of Parliament of India to provide for the conduct of elections of the Houses of Parliament and to the House or Houses of the Legislature of each State, the qualifications and disqualifications for membership of those Houses, the corrupt practices and other offences at or in connection with such elections and the decision of doubts and disputes arising out of or in connection with such elections.

4 views

Related Questions

In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘Strong’ arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below if followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ‘strong’ argument is and which a ‘weak’ argument is. Statement: Is it advantageous to hold elections simultaneously for parliament and the state assemblies Argument: I: Yes, this way ensures election expenditure is reduced. II: No, Parties are held accountable through frequent elections, which will lose it purpose through joint elections.?
1 Answers 4 Views
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘Strong’ arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below if followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ‘strong’ argument is and which a ‘weak’ argument is. Statement: Should fight for Cauvery river stop between the states Arguments: I. Yes, because instead of fighting over it, the river should be saved and actions should be taken in cleaning up. II. No, because this fight is benefiting the political parties in many ways.?
1 Answers 5 Views
Two statements are followed by three Conclusions I, II and III. You have to consider the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements and indicate your answer accordingly. Statements: I. Political parties that opposed simultaneous polls before the Law Commission mostly cited federalism, Constitution and impracticability for their opposition, but Goa Forward Party chose coconuts to drive home its point against the proposal of ‘One Nation, One Election'. II. The regional party that is part of the BJP-led Goa government cited coconut, its party symbol, to argue that regional issues will go unaddressed in the noise of simultaneous polls. Conclusions: I. To buttress its reasoning, Goa Forward Party representative cited the party's history and struggle in protesting against cutting down of coconut trees in Goa before it came to power with ally BJP in March 2017. II. The party had protested against the BJP government's decision to amend rules to simplify the procedure of cutting down coconut trees by removing it from the list of trees. III. The commission held talks with political parties on the proposal of simultaneous elections.?
1 Answers 5 Views
In the question below, are given a statement followed by three courses of actions numbered I, II and III. On the basis of the information given, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the suggested courses of action logically follow(s) for pursuing. Statement: The rupee may slump to a new low this year amid global policy uncertainties while domestic interest rates will remain elevated, raising borrowing costs, according to an ET poll of 20 market participants. Nearly three-fourths of the respondents believe the local unit could touch 69 to the dollar with some even pointing to 70 by December-end. The rupee is one of the worst-performing emerging market currencies this year, having lost about 6.7 per cent to the greenback to close at 68.13 on Monday. Courses of action: I. Indian corporates may borrow less ahead of elections with the likely benchmark rate at 8 per cent or more. Half the poll participants were of the opinion that the benchmark yield will either hover around that level or rise further. II. External factors coupled with domestic macro measures like weak current account deficit or fiscal deficit are likely to impact the rupee. The US Fed seems to be on course to raise rates.  III. Upcoming elections trigger a bit of policy uncertainty. A cocktail of factors including dollar strengthening, foreign fund outflows, general emerging market weakness and oil would continue to weigh on the rupee.?
1 Answers 4 Views