Since the past few years, the campaigning by the political parties before elections has become meticulous and elaborate. It now involves political campaigns on social media, advertisements on television and internet etc. This has also reaped good results as the voting turnout for local as well as central elections has increased drastically. The statements above, if true, best support which of the following assertions?

Question

Since the past few years, the campaigning by the political parties before elections has become meticulous and elaborate. It now involves political campaigns on social media, advertisements on television and internet etc. This has also reaped good results as the voting turnout for local as well as central elections has increased drastically. The statements above, if true, best support which of the following assertions?

Digitalisation of political campaigning has raised awareness among people and the voice of the leaders reaches several people quite fast.
Everything on social media is attractive to people. Digital campaigning is intriguing for a lot of people.
Voting turnout has increased because leaders with a large number of followers are participating in the elections.
More and more people are voting because they want a change in the current political scenario.
People like the concept of campaigning on social media and they also enjoy it.

LohaHridoy

4 views

2025-01-04 04:42

1 Answers

Related Questions

In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘Strong’ arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below if followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ‘strong’ argument is and which a ‘weak’ argument is. Statement: Is it advantageous to hold elections simultaneously for parliament and the state assemblies Argument: I: Yes, this way ensures election expenditure is reduced. II: No, Parties are held accountable through frequent elections, which will lose it purpose through joint elections.?

1 Answers 4 Views

The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: World’s largest beer maker Heineken NV, the majority partner of United Breweries with Vijay Mallya, is understood to have sought legal opinion over its right to appoint a chairman at the Indian company. Heineken and some of its advisers believe that the shareholder agreement between Mallya and the beer giant has become null and void after India’s Enforcement Directorate attached his shares as part of its legal action against the liquor baron. Which among the following arguments support the above statement in the best possible manner Arguments: I. UBL has stopped sharing confidential information with Mallya and has said that he is no longer privy to any strategic developments. II. The board of UBL, India’s biggest beer company, had asked Mallya to either step down or appoint a nominee after the Securities and Exchange Board of India barred wilful defaulters from holding key board positions last year. III. The company is functioning well and operations are in good shape but it is not good corporate governance to have an acting chairman for so long.?

1 Answers 7 Views

A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance with commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement Statement: The sale of television X has increased in the last month. Inferences: I. Television X is offering their products on discounted prices. II. The sale of other television brands has decreased.?

1 Answers 5 Views

Many poor families suffer due to the male members of family being addicted to alcohol. This not only burdens them with the unemployment of addicted members but also with bearing the expenses of buying alcohol. In most cases, it also leads to domestic violence on women. Experts state that banning alcohol would not reduce the consumption of alcohol but would cause further financial burden on these poor families. The statements above, if true, best support which of the following assertions?

1 Answers 5 Views

A government employee is a public servant. Even though they're paid by the Government for their work, government employees nowadays are corrupt and inefficient in their work. Forgetting their first priority, they are now only focusing on earning more and more money. The statements above, if true, best support which of the following assertions?

1 Answers 5 Views

In olden times, hunting was a leisure activity for people. It was enjoyable and relaxing. The state has now recognized hunting as a harmful activity for the ecosystem. It has been made illegal to hunt since the lives of many animals are threatened. The statements above, if true, best support which of the following assertions?

1 Answers 4 Views

The United Nations has many bodies but all function differently. While UNSC has only fifteen members, five of which are permanent and the rest are elected every two years; UNGA has one hundred and ninety-two members. Despite having so many members UNGA is more democratic than UNSC. The statements above, if true, best support which of the following assertions?

1 Answers 7 Views

Two statements are followed by three Conclusions I, II and III. You have to consider the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements and indicate your answer accordingly. Statements: I. Political parties that opposed simultaneous polls before the Law Commission mostly cited federalism, Constitution and impracticability for their opposition, but Goa Forward Party chose coconuts to drive home its point against the proposal of ‘One Nation, One Election'. II. The regional party that is part of the BJP-led Goa government cited coconut, its party symbol, to argue that regional issues will go unaddressed in the noise of simultaneous polls. Conclusions: I. To buttress its reasoning, Goa Forward Party representative cited the party's history and struggle in protesting against cutting down of coconut trees in Goa before it came to power with ally BJP in March 2017. II. The party had protested against the BJP government's decision to amend rules to simplify the procedure of cutting down coconut trees by removing it from the list of trees. III. The commission held talks with political parties on the proposal of simultaneous elections.?

1 Answers 5 Views

Below each question are given two statements (I) and (II). These statements may be either independent causes or may be effects of independent causes or a common cause. One of these statements may be the effect of the other statement. Read both the statements and decide which of the following answer choice correctly depicts the relationship between these two statements. Statement I: India has become a polio free nation. Statement II: Government led extensive campaigns in the past decade spreading awareness about vaccination from polio. ?

1 Answers 5 Views

Engines are rated at specified conditions. Then which of the following statements are correct 1. Power developed increases as local temperature increases. 2. Power developed increases as local temperature decreases 3. Power developed is not dependent on local temperature. 4. Power developed increases as local atmospheric pressure increases. 5. Power developed increases as local atmospheric pressure decreases.?

1 Answers 5 Views

AhmedNazir · Accepted Answer · 2022-09-04T04:29:57+06:00

Option 1 : Digitalisation of political campaigning has raised awareness among people and the voice of the leaders reaches several people quite fast.

The statements discuss the new ways of political campaigning and the positive response of the voters. Option 2 provides a logical argument but an attractive way of campaigning is not enough reason for greater turnouts. Option 3 and 4 do not give a unique reason for greater turnouts because popular leaders and people who want a change existed in the past too but it did not result in greater turnouts as now. Option 5 states the same thing as option 2 in different words and is therefore wrong. Only option 1 provides us with a reason that shows that something about this campaigning was different than the past campaigns and also gives a valid reason for the increased voting turnouts. Hence, option 1 is the correct solution.