Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

  1. Prohibition
  2. Mandamus
  3. Quo Warranto
  4. Habeas Corpus
4 views

1 Answers

Option 2 : Mandamus

Article 32 of the Constitution of India states that Supreme Court and High Courts can issue the writs to protect the fundamental rights of the citizen (Right to the Constitutional Remedies). Mandamus is a judicial writ issued by the court to an inferior court or government or judicial officers as a command to perform their duty.

Writs Implication
Habeas Corpus To protect personal liberty
Mandamus Issued to lower court or government or judicial officers as a command to perform their duty
Prohibition Issued to the lower court to assure their jurisdiction
Certiorari Issued to lower court to transfer any subject
Quo Warranto Issued by the court if any person is holding the post unconstitutionally

 

4 views

Related Questions

The question below consists of a set of labeled sentences. From the four options given, select the most probable sequence to form a coherent paragraph. A. Returning to the lobby, the reception desk, the massive bouquet of flowers, the well-dressed guests, the brass carts piled with expensive luggage, all of them had spun around him like a carousel, then floated one by one in an arc across his vision. B. The day Paul passed his exams, two of his professors took him for a drink which led on to a tad too many drinks, ice-cold Martinis on an unseasonably warm Spring day. C. After they left him, shaking hands a final time, patting him on the back for a good measure, he went to the men's room, splashed water on his face, pressed a plush white towel to his temples and sprayed himself with some cologne from a leather-encased bottle by the sink. D. He drank them quickly on an empty stomach and little sleep the night before, and suddenly he was drunk.?
1 Answers 7 Views
The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong' arguments and which is/are ‘weak' arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement:  The central government has told the Supreme Court that anti-adultery laws were required to protect the ‘sanctity of marriage and the institution of family', and any attempt to do away with these laws would hurt ‘Indian ethos'. The government was responding to a court notice on a public interest litigation which wanted the law struck down as it was not gender neutral and the provisions were tilted against men. Which among the following arguments support the above statement regarding the ‘revision of such laws' in the best possible manner Arguments: I. It seemed to suggest that women were chattel owned by men and could be guided and misguided. II. This would erode the sanctity of marriage as an institution and the societal fabric. The issue of making the provision gender neutral was already pending before the government. III. Any step towards decriminalising the offence in the interim would be detrimental to Indian ethos which gives paramount importance to the institution and sanctity of marriage.?
1 Answers 4 Views
Which of the following distinction(s) is/are not correct between public issue and rights issue (A) In public issue, applications for shares are invited from the general public and in rights issue, the shares are offered to existing shareholders. (B) In public issue there is no question of any over-subscription and in rights issue the shares may be under subscribed or over subscribed leading to prorata allotment. (C) The price of public issue is generally less than the market price and in rights issue, the price is deliberately made less than the market price. (D) In a public issue, the communication of the issue is through prospectus or advertisements and in a rights issue the communication is between the company and the existing members of the company. Choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below:?
1 Answers 6 Views