Consider the statement and the following arguments and decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the 4 statements. Statement: To save the city from air pollution, should citizens use more public transport Arguments: I. Yes, everybody should only use public transport unless it is an emergency II. No, it is not a very good idea to use public transport as it might not be convenient for all?

Only argument I is strong
Only argument II is strong
Both arguments I and II are strong
Neither I nor II is strong

LohaHridoy

4 views

2025-01-04 04:42

1 Answers

AhmedNazir

Option 1 : Only argument I is strong

The given statement talks about saving the city from air pollution.

Vehicles are one of the main sources of air pollution.

Therefore, restricting the use of personal vehicles and using public transport is a great step in this direction. Hence, argument I is strong.

Inconvenience caused to some people cannot be considered as a strong reason to reject the idea of using public transport which has more benefits than disadvantages.

Thus, argument II is not strong.

Hence, only argument I is strong.

4 views Answered 2022-09-04 04:29

Related Questions

In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument. Statement : Should high tax rates be imposed on businesses Argument I : No, High taxes discourage investments, thus reducing jobs and development. Argument II : Yes, Some businesses use clever accounting to save tax, so higher taxes will be a good counter measure.?

1 Answers 4 Views

Consider the statement and the following arguments and decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the statement. Statement: The number of cars in the city has increased and it’s a menace for the bicycle riders Arguments: I. Yes, increased four wheeler traffic creates jam at junctions and other commuters are affected. There should be a cap on the four wheeler sales in a year II. No, if well-disciplined driving rules are followed, increase in car volume will not result in road menace?

1 Answers 4 Views

A statement is followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the statement. Statement: Government should implement price control on medicines and medical devices. Arguments: I. Yes, price control in healthcare have the noble intention of enhancing patient welfare for poor and middle-class people. II. No, health care organisations will end up incurring losses or making less margin.?

1 Answers 4 Views

A statement is followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the statement. Statement: There is more wastage of water due to water purifiers. Arguments: I. Yes, houses should adopt ways to reuse the excess water produced from the filters so that it can be given back to the land. II. No it enters the sewage system and automatically goes back.?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments I and II. You have to consider the statement True even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given argument, if any, is a strong argument. Statement: Should Indian government Implant Air purifiers in all cities to curb air pollution. Arguments I: Yes, because in most of the Indian cities the PPM is above 200 which comes in category of “Extremely Dangerous” category. II: No, because this is not the permanent solution to curb air pollution?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the following question, three statements are given followed by three conclusions. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) the given statements. Statements: I. Only a few chocolates are good. II. Only good is bad. III. Few cartoons are good. Conclusions: I. Some chocolates being bad is a possibility. II. All cartoons are chocolates. III. All cartoons are good.?

1 Answers 4 Views

A statement is followed by two arguments. You have to decide which of the argument is/are strong with respect to the statement. Statement: Should every household use solar energy to reduce electricity requirements Argument: I. Yes, this will save resources and also promote environmental compatibility. II. No, panels are expensive and not all houses can buy them without subsidies.?

1 Answers 4 Views

Given is a statement followed by two arguments numbered I and II. Consider the statement and the arguments and decide which of the arguments is/are strong. Statement: Should sports be made compulsory for primary students Arguments: I. Yes, sports are important for physical development. II. No, sports waste the academic time of students, thus making them weaker in academics.?

1 Answers 4 Views

A statement is followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the statement. statement: Should Public be mobilized to adopt and maintain trees road side Arguments: Yes, this will help to recover the green cover faster as each would take responsibility for the trees near their homes.. No, the local government bodies should maintain as public would not take responsibility.?

1 Answers 4 Views

Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument STATEMENT: Should we construct residential buildings in an industrial area ARGUMENT: 1. Yes, People working in Industry will save a lot of time due to travelling. 2. No. Pollution level in areas near industry is very high?

1 Answers 4 Views

এক্সাম দিয়ে মেধা যাচাই করুন

Job Preparation (1125)

Admission (754)

এসএসসি (10)

এইচএসসি (5)