A statement is followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the statement. Statement: Government should implement price control on medicines and medical devices. Arguments: I. Yes, price control in healthcare have the noble intention of enhancing patient welfare for poor and middle-class people. II. No, health care organisations will end up incurring losses or making less margin.?

Only II is strong
Only I is strong
Neither I nor II is strong
Either I or II is strong

LohaHridoy

4 views

2025-01-04 04:42

1 Answers

AhmedNazir

Option 2 : Only I is strong

Argument 1: This is strong because, price control in health care will be helpful for the middle-class people

Argument 2: This is not strong because, price control does not mean that there will be losses for health care organisations.

4 views Answered 2022-09-04 04:29

Related Questions

There are five classes class 1, class 2, class 3, class 4 and class 5 in a school. They are one above the other. Class 1 is at the bottom, then class 2 above it and so on. Five videos M1, M2, M3, M4 and M5 are displayed in these given classes. Only one video is displayed in a particular class. Each video is displayed only one time. Video M5 is displayed at an even numbered class. Video M2 is displayed at class 1. Video M1 is displayed at the class just below M5. Video M4 is not displayed at even numbered class. Which of the following statement is not correct?

1 Answers 5 Views

A question is given followed by two arguments numbered I and II. you have to decide which of the arguments is a ‘strong’ argument. Question: Should the people of India pay taxes to the government Arguments: I. Yes, taxes have to be paid to the government to run the country. II. No, taxes need not to be paid, as a person has to look after his/her needs first.?

1 Answers 4 Views

Consider the statement and the following arguments and decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the statement. Statement: The number of cars in the city has increased and it’s a menace for the bicycle riders Arguments: I. Yes, increased four wheeler traffic creates jam at junctions and other commuters are affected. There should be a cap on the four wheeler sales in a year II. No, if well-disciplined driving rules are followed, increase in car volume will not result in road menace?

1 Answers 4 Views

A statement is followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the statement. Statement: There is more wastage of water due to water purifiers. Arguments: I. Yes, houses should adopt ways to reuse the excess water produced from the filters so that it can be given back to the land. II. No it enters the sewage system and automatically goes back.?

1 Answers 4 Views

Question: In the question, a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument. Statement: Should the use of marijuana in medicines also be banned Argument 1: No. The medical use, prescribed and monitored, is helpful to cure a lot of rare conditions. Argument 2: Yes. The drug is narcotic and its overuse results in uncertain effects.?

1 Answers 4 Views

Question: In the question, a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument. Statement: Should the rain water near factories be distributed by the municipal corporation for drinking purpose Argument 1: Yes. The water distributed goes through a treatment plant, making it safe for drinking. Argument 2: No. The rainwater near factories is affected with chemicals that cannot be removed at water treatment plants.?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the question, a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument. Statement: Should the privatization of every government bank be promoted Argument 1: Yes. That would reduce the administrative burden on the government. Argument 2: No. That would weaken the financial condition of government banks.?

1 Answers 4 Views

Question: In the question, a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument. Statement: Should Indian cricket team accept the invitation for a tournament hosted in Pakistan given the hostile situation in the host country Argument 1: Yes. Politics should not affect sportsmen spirit. Argument 2: No. Safety of the players should not be undermined.?

1 Answers 4 Views

Given is a statement followed by two arguments numbered I and II. Consider the statement and the arguments and decide which of the arguments is/are strong. Statement: Should sports be made compulsory for primary students Arguments: I. Yes, sports are important for physical development. II. No, sports waste the academic time of students, thus making them weaker in academics.?

1 Answers 4 Views

A statement is followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the statement. statement: Should Public be mobilized to adopt and maintain trees road side Arguments: Yes, this will help to recover the green cover faster as each would take responsibility for the trees near their homes.. No, the local government bodies should maintain as public would not take responsibility.?

1 Answers 4 Views

এক্সাম দিয়ে মেধা যাচাই করুন

Job Preparation (1125)

Admission (754)

এসএসসি (10)

এইচএসসি (5)