Question: In the question, a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument. Statement: Should Indian cricket team accept the invitation for a tournament hosted in Pakistan given the hostile situation in the host country Argument 1: Yes. Politics should not affect sportsmen spirit. Argument 2: No. Safety of the players should not be undermined.?

Only argument 1 is strong.
Only argument 2 is strong.
Neither argument 1 nor 2 is strong.
Both argument 1 and 2 are strong.

LohaHridoy

4 views

2025-01-04 04:42

1 Answers

AhmedNazir

Option 2 : Only argument 2 is strong.

Answer: Option 2

Solution:

In general cases, politics should not affect sportsmen spirit.

However, since the hostility in Pakistan may pose a threat to the safety of Indian players, the best measure would be to reject the invitation. Therefore, only argument 2 is strong.

4 views Answered 2022-09-04 04:29

Related Questions

In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument. Statement: Should teachers be permitted to cane unruly children Argument I: No, this will teach them that physical violence is an acceptable means of social behaviour. Argument II: Yes, children taught in a strict atmosphere are more successful.?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument. Statement : Should high tax rates be imposed on businesses Argument I : No, High taxes discourage investments, thus reducing jobs and development. Argument II : Yes, Some businesses use clever accounting to save tax, so higher taxes will be a good counter measure.?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments I and II. You have to consider the statement True even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given argument, if any, is a strong argument. Statement: Should Indian government Implant Air purifiers in all cities to curb air pollution. Arguments I: Yes, because in most of the Indian cities the PPM is above 200 which comes in category of “Extremely Dangerous” category. II: No, because this is not the permanent solution to curb air pollution?

1 Answers 4 Views

Question: In the question, a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument. Statement: Should the use of marijuana in medicines also be banned Argument 1: No. The medical use, prescribed and monitored, is helpful to cure a lot of rare conditions. Argument 2: Yes. The drug is narcotic and its overuse results in uncertain effects.?

1 Answers 4 Views

Question: In the question, a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument. Statement: Should the rain water near factories be distributed by the municipal corporation for drinking purpose Argument 1: Yes. The water distributed goes through a treatment plant, making it safe for drinking. Argument 2: No. The rainwater near factories is affected with chemicals that cannot be removed at water treatment plants.?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the question, a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument. Statement: Should the privatization of every government bank be promoted Argument 1: Yes. That would reduce the administrative burden on the government. Argument 2: No. That would weaken the financial condition of government banks.?

1 Answers 4 Views

Question: In the question, a statement is given followed by two arguments, numbered 1 and 2. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument. Statement: Should admissions to higher educational institutions be compulsorily based on merit Argument 1: No. This would be unfair to the weaker students. Argument 2: Yes. This would improve the quality of work put in by students. ?

1 Answers 4 Views

In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a Strong argument is and which a weak argument is. Statement: Should schools in India have only one board of education Arguments: I) Yes, it will create uniformity and equality in education. II) No, it will reduce chances of either quality education or/and may affect literacy rate.?

1 Answers 6 Views

In the question, a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument. Statement: Should one year of army training be compulsory for all Indian citizens Argument I: No, the costs of training will be prohibitive and one year of labour will be lost. Argument II: Yes, army training helps make better citizens.?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument. Statement: Should eating Paan at public places be made punishable Argument I: Yes, people eat Paan and spit and makes public places dirty. Argument II: No, Indians love Paan.?

1 Answers 4 Views

এক্সাম দিয়ে মেধা যাচাই করুন

Job Preparation (1125)

Admission (754)

এসএসসি (10)

এইচএসসি (5)