In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument. Statement: Should teachers be permitted to cane unruly children Argument I: No, this will teach them that physical violence is an acceptable means of social behaviour. Argument II: Yes, children taught in a strict atmosphere are more successful.?

only argument II is strong
neither argument I nor II is strong
both argument I and II are strong
only argument I is strong

LohaHridoy

4 views

2025-01-04 04:42

1 Answers

AhmedNazir

Option 4 : only argument I is strong

Argument 1: This is strong, because it is mentioned that this will teach them that physical violence is an acceptable means of social behaviour.

Argument 2: This is not strong, because children taught in a strict atmosphere are more successful is not valid.

Hence, “only argument 1” is strong.

4 views Answered 2022-09-04 04:29

Related Questions

Given Below is statement followed by some conclusions. You have to take the given statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance with the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follow (s) from the given statement. Statement: All hard-working people are successful. Conclusions: I. All successful people are hard-working. II. Only hard work can guarantee success in life. Decide the right option from below. A. Only conclusion I follows B.Only conclusion II follows C. Both I and II follow D. Neither of them follows.?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the question two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the mentioned statements. Statement 1: All huts are made of mud. Statement 2: Things made of mud are not strong. Conclusion I: All huts are strong. Conclusion II: Mud huts are not strong.?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument. Statement : Should high tax rates be imposed on businesses Argument I : No, High taxes discourage investments, thus reducing jobs and development. Argument II : Yes, Some businesses use clever accounting to save tax, so higher taxes will be a good counter measure.?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the question two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement 1 : No wood is bamboo. Statement 2 : No bamboo is strong. Conclusion I : No wood is strong. Conclusion II : All strong things are wood.?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments I and II. You have to consider the statement True even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given argument, if any, is a strong argument. Statement: Should Indian government Implant Air purifiers in all cities to curb air pollution. Arguments I: Yes, because in most of the Indian cities the PPM is above 200 which comes in category of “Extremely Dangerous” category. II: No, because this is not the permanent solution to curb air pollution?

1 Answers 4 Views

Question: In the question, a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument. Statement: Should the use of marijuana in medicines also be banned Argument 1: No. The medical use, prescribed and monitored, is helpful to cure a lot of rare conditions. Argument 2: Yes. The drug is narcotic and its overuse results in uncertain effects.?

1 Answers 4 Views

Question: In the question, a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument. Statement: Should the rain water near factories be distributed by the municipal corporation for drinking purpose Argument 1: Yes. The water distributed goes through a treatment plant, making it safe for drinking. Argument 2: No. The rainwater near factories is affected with chemicals that cannot be removed at water treatment plants.?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the question, a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument. Statement: Should the privatization of every government bank be promoted Argument 1: Yes. That would reduce the administrative burden on the government. Argument 2: No. That would weaken the financial condition of government banks.?

1 Answers 4 Views

Question: In the question, a statement is given followed by two arguments, numbered 1 and 2. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument. Statement: Should admissions to higher educational institutions be compulsorily based on merit Argument 1: No. This would be unfair to the weaker students. Argument 2: Yes. This would improve the quality of work put in by students. ?

1 Answers 4 Views

Question: In the question, a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument. Statement: Should Indian cricket team accept the invitation for a tournament hosted in Pakistan given the hostile situation in the host country Argument 1: Yes. Politics should not affect sportsmen spirit. Argument 2: No. Safety of the players should not be undermined.?

1 Answers 4 Views

এক্সাম দিয়ে মেধা যাচাই করুন

Job Preparation (1125)

Admission (754)

এসএসসি (10)

এইচএসসি (5)