In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments I and II. You have to consider the statement True even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given argument, if any, is a strong argument. Statement: Should Indian government Implant Air purifiers in all cities to curb air pollution. Arguments I: Yes, because in most of the Indian cities the PPM is above 200 which comes in category of “Extremely Dangerous” category. II: No, because this is not the permanent solution to curb air pollution?

If Neither argument I nor II is strong
If Only argument I is strong
If both argument I and II are strong
If Only II follow is strong

LohaHridoy

4 views

2025-01-04 04:42

1 Answers

AhmedNazir

Option 3 : If both argument I and II are strong

Statement I is strong because air pollution is a major issue and air purifier can be an option. Although it is not permanent solution but to immediately control air pollution air purifiers can be beneficial. Statement II is strong because air purifier is not a feasible and permanent solution. Hence, both the arguments are strong.

4 views Answered 2022-09-04 04:29

Related Questions

In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument. Statement: Should teachers be permitted to cane unruly children Argument I: No, this will teach them that physical violence is an acceptable means of social behaviour. Argument II: Yes, children taught in a strict atmosphere are more successful.?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the question two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the mentioned statements. Statement 1: All huts are made of mud. Statement 2: Things made of mud are not strong. Conclusion I: All huts are strong. Conclusion II: Mud huts are not strong.?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument. Statement : Should high tax rates be imposed on businesses Argument I : No, High taxes discourage investments, thus reducing jobs and development. Argument II : Yes, Some businesses use clever accounting to save tax, so higher taxes will be a good counter measure.?

1 Answers 4 Views

Question: In the question, a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument. Statement: Should the use of marijuana in medicines also be banned Argument 1: No. The medical use, prescribed and monitored, is helpful to cure a lot of rare conditions. Argument 2: Yes. The drug is narcotic and its overuse results in uncertain effects.?

1 Answers 4 Views

Question: In the question, a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument. Statement: Should the rain water near factories be distributed by the municipal corporation for drinking purpose Argument 1: Yes. The water distributed goes through a treatment plant, making it safe for drinking. Argument 2: No. The rainwater near factories is affected with chemicals that cannot be removed at water treatment plants.?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the question, a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument. Statement: Should the privatization of every government bank be promoted Argument 1: Yes. That would reduce the administrative burden on the government. Argument 2: No. That would weaken the financial condition of government banks.?

1 Answers 4 Views

Question: In the question, a statement is given followed by two arguments, numbered 1 and 2. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument. Statement: Should admissions to higher educational institutions be compulsorily based on merit Argument 1: No. This would be unfair to the weaker students. Argument 2: Yes. This would improve the quality of work put in by students. ?

1 Answers 4 Views

Question: In the question, a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument. Statement: Should Indian cricket team accept the invitation for a tournament hosted in Pakistan given the hostile situation in the host country Argument 1: Yes. Politics should not affect sportsmen spirit. Argument 2: No. Safety of the players should not be undermined.?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the question three statements are given, followed by three conclusions, I, II and III. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement I: All Gyms are clean. Statement II: Some cities are smart cities. Statement III: All smart cities are clean. Conclusion I: Some cities which are not smart cities are clean is a possibility. Conclusion II: Some smart cities have Gym. Conclusion III: Some cities have Gym.?

1 Answers 5 Views

In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a Strong argument is and which a weak argument is. Statement: Is privatizing all the schools in India the best solution to attain 100% literacy rate Arguments: I. Yes, private institutes are responsible and dedicated towards their work. II. No, education will become unaffordable for poor people.?

1 Answers 6 Views

এক্সাম দিয়ে মেধা যাচাই করুন

Job Preparation (1125)

Admission (754)

এসএসসি (10)

এইচএসসি (5)