Consider the statement and the following arguments and decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the statement. Statement: The number of cars in the city has increased and it’s a menace for the bicycle riders Arguments: I. Yes, increased four wheeler traffic creates jam at junctions and other commuters are affected. There should be a cap on the four wheeler sales in a year II. No, if well-disciplined driving rules are followed, increase in car volume will not result in road menace?

Only argument I is strong
Neither I nor II is strong
Only arguments II is strong
Both arguments I and II are strong

LohaHridoy

4 views

2025-01-04 04:42

1 Answers

AhmedNazir

Option 1 : Only argument I is strong

Statement I is implicit as the core issue is increased number of four wheelers and the argument I insists on a cap on the number of four wheeler in the market. Statement II insists on well-disciplined traffic rules. But well – disciplined traffic can also result in jam and create menace for bicycle riders. So, argument II is not implicit.

Hence, only statement I is implicit.

4 views Answered 2022-09-04 04:29

Related Questions

Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong’ argument. Statement: Should speed driving be imposed heavy penalties Arguments: I. Yes, speed driving is one of the major causes of road deaths as per statistics. II. No, speed driving helps a person to reach his destination soon.?

1 Answers 4 Views

Consider the statement and the following arguments and decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the 4 statements. Statement: To save the city from air pollution, should citizens use more public transport Arguments: I. Yes, everybody should only use public transport unless it is an emergency II. No, it is not a very good idea to use public transport as it might not be convenient for all?

1 Answers 4 Views

A database of research articles in a journal uses the following schema. (VOLUME, NUMBER, STARTPAGE, ENDPAGE, TITLE, YEAR, PRICE) The primary key is (VOLUME, NUMBER, STARTPAGE, ENDPAGE) and the following functional dependencies exist in the schema. (VOLUME, NUMBER, STARTPAGE, ENDPAGE) → TITLE (VOLUME, NUMBER) → YEAR (VOLUME, NUMBER, STARTPAGE, ENDPAGE) → PRICE The database is redesigned to use the following schemas. (VOLUME, NUMBER, STARTPAGE, ENDPAGE, TITLE, PRICE) (VOLUME, NUMBER, YEAR) Which is the weakest normal form that the new database satisfies, but the old one does not ?

1 Answers 4 Views

A statement is followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the statement. Statement: There is more wastage of water due to water purifiers. Arguments: I. Yes, houses should adopt ways to reuse the excess water produced from the filters so that it can be given back to the land. II. No it enters the sewage system and automatically goes back.?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows the given statements. Statements: I. No Benz car is a Ferrari car. II. No Volkswagen car is a Lamborghini car. Conclusions: I. Some Volkswagen cars are Benz cars. II. Some Ferrari cars are Lamborghini cars.?

1 Answers 4 Views

Question: In the question, a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument. Statement: Should the rain water near factories be distributed by the municipal corporation for drinking purpose Argument 1: Yes. The water distributed goes through a treatment plant, making it safe for drinking. Argument 2: No. The rainwater near factories is affected with chemicals that cannot be removed at water treatment plants.?

1 Answers 4 Views

Question: In the question, a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument. Statement: Should Indian cricket team accept the invitation for a tournament hosted in Pakistan given the hostile situation in the host country Argument 1: Yes. Politics should not affect sportsmen spirit. Argument 2: No. Safety of the players should not be undermined.?

1 Answers 4 Views

Two statements are given followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: Some cars are vehicles. No vehicle is a four-wheeler. Conclusions: I. No car is a four-wheeler. II. All four-wheelers are cars. III. Some vehicles are cars.?

1 Answers 4 Views

Given is a statement followed by two arguments numbered I and II. Consider the statement and the arguments and decide which of the arguments is/are strong. Statement: Should sports be made compulsory for primary students Arguments: I. Yes, sports are important for physical development. II. No, sports waste the academic time of students, thus making them weaker in academics.?

1 Answers 4 Views

A statement is followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the statement. statement: Should Public be mobilized to adopt and maintain trees road side Arguments: Yes, this will help to recover the green cover faster as each would take responsibility for the trees near their homes.. No, the local government bodies should maintain as public would not take responsibility.?

1 Answers 4 Views

এক্সাম দিয়ে মেধা যাচাই করুন

Job Preparation (1125)

Admission (754)

এসএসসি (10)

এইচএসসি (5)