A perception where we do not have the knowledge of an object characterized by any predicate but an apprehension of some unrelated elements is called as?

A perception where we do not have the knowledge of an object characterized by any predicate but an apprehension of some unrelated elements is called as? Correct Answer Indeterminate perception

  • The literal meaning of the term ‘perception’ is ‘pratyaksa’.
  • The word ‘aksa’ in ‘Pratyaksa’ means the sense organ and ‘Prati’ means all the sense organs.
  • Therefore the word Pratyaksa means the function of each of the sense organs in respect of their appropriate objects.
  • Perception is considered as the basic or fundamental source of knowledge.

The Two Modes of Perception (according to the Indian Philosophy)

The Indeterminate Perception (Nirvikalpa):

  • It is the first stage in the process of perception. It is devoid of subject-predicate relation.
  • The nirvikalpa perception of a thing is its perception at the first moment of the association of the senses and their objects. It is its observation at the primary snapshot of an object.
  • It is the primary cognition of an object which is not cognitive i.e. without any determination of the name of the object or the class to which the object belongs. Here, there is no apprehension of generic and specific features although they are implicitly present.
  • It is a state of undifferentiated, nonrelational consciousness, free from the work of assimilation and discrimination, analysis and synthesis.
  • For example, when we perceive a jug, we see the jug as a jug, we do not try to find out what is the shape of the jug, what is its colour or how the jug is different from other objects etc. Here, we are not concerned with the qualities of the object.
  • So, a perception where we do not have the knowledge of an object characterized by any predicate but an apprehension of some unrelated elements is called indeterminate perception.

Determinate Perception (Savikalpa):

  • Determinate perception takes place after the indeterminate stage. There cannot be any Savikalpa perception of an object without a previous nirvikalpa perception of it.
  • Indeterminate perception is simple apprehension while the determinate is perceptual judgment.
  • So, in the previous example of a jug, when we try to apprehend the jug in relation to its qualities, indeterminate perception transforms into determinate perception.

Hence, a perception where we do not know an object characterized by any predicate but an apprehension of some unrelated elements is called indeterminate perception.

Related Questions

Read the passage carefully and choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives and click the button corresponding to it.
Learning is the knowledge of that which is not generally known to others, and which we can only derive at second­hand from books or other artificial sources. The knowledge of that which is before us, or about us, which appeals to our experience, passions, and pursuits, to the bosoms and businesses of men, is not learning. Learning is the knowledge of that which none but the learned know. He is the most learned man who knows the most of what is farthest removed from common life and actual observation. The learned man prides himself in the knowledge of names, and dates, not of men or things. He thinks and cares nothing about his next­door neighbours, but he is deeply read in the tribes and castes of the Hindoos and Calmuc Tartars. He can hardly find his way into the next street, though he is acquainted with the exact dimensions of Constantinople and Peking. He does not know whether his oldest acquaintance is a knave or a fool, but he can pronounce a pompous lecture on all the principal characters in history. He cannot tell whether an object is black or white, round or square, and yet he is a professed master of the optics and the rules of perspective.
the knowledge related to the businesses of men
Read the passage carefully and choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives and click the button corresponding to it.
Learning is the knowledge of that which is not generally known to others, and which we can only derive at second­hand from books or other artificial sources. The knowledge of that which is before us, or about us, which appeals to our experience, passions, and pursuits, to the bosoms and businesses of men, is not learning. Learning is the knowledge of that which none but the learned know. He is the most learned man who knows the most of what is farthest removed from common life and actual observation. The learned man prides himself in the knowledge of names, and dates, not of men or things. He thinks and cares nothing about his next­door neighbours, but he is deeply read in the tribes and castes of the Hindoos and Calmuc Tartars. He can hardly find his way into the next street, though he is acquainted with the exact dimensions of Constantinople and Peking. He does not know whether his oldest acquaintance is a knave or a fool, but he can pronounce a pompous lecture on all the principal characters in history. He cannot tell whether an object is black or white, round or square, and yet he is a professed master of the optics and the rules of perspective.
Learning is defined as
Read the passage carefully and choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives and click the button corresponding to it.
Learning is the knowledge of that which is not generally known to others, and which we can only derive at second­hand from books or other artificial sources. The knowledge of that which is before us, or about us, which appeals to our experience, passions, and pursuits, to the bosoms and businesses of men, is not learning. Learning is the knowledge of that which none but the learned know. He is the most learned man who knows the most of what is farthest removed from common life and actual observation. The learned man prides himself in the knowledge of names, and dates, not of men or things. He thinks and cares nothing about his next­door neighbours, but he is deeply read in the tribes and castes of the Hindoos and Calmuc Tartars. He can hardly find his way into the next street, though he is acquainted with the exact dimensions of Constantinople and Peking. He does not know whether his oldest acquaintance is a knave or a fool, but he can pronounce a pompous lecture on all the principal characters in history. He cannot tell whether an object is black or white, round or square, and yet he is a professed master of the optics and the rules of perspective.
The given passage implies that