Which of the following is/are objective(s) of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970? to encourage the employment of contract labour. to regulate the working conditions of the contract labour wherever such employment is not prohibited.

Which of the following is/are objective(s) of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970? to encourage the employment of contract labour. to regulate the working conditions of the contract labour wherever such employment is not prohibited. Correct Answer 2 only

The correct answer is 2 only.

Key Points

Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970

  • The act defines a worker as a workman who shall be deemed to be employed as contract labour in or in connection with the work of an establishment where he is hired in or in connection with such work by or through a contractor or without the knowledge of the employer. 
  • The main objectives of the act are
    • to prohibit the employment of contract labour. Hence, Statement 1 is incorrect.
    • to regulate the working conditions of the Contract Labour where ever such employment is not prohibited. Hence, Statement 2 is correct.
  • It regulates the employment of contract labour in certain establishments.
  • It applies to every establishment where there are 20 or more workmen employed on any day of the preceding 12 months as contract labour. 
    • The Government may by notification in the Official Gazette make provisions of the applicable to establishments or contractor employing less than 20 workmen. 
  • It prohibits the employment of contract labour jobs that are perennial in nature and where permanent employees need to be employed.
  • A contractor needs to obtain a licence issued by a licensing officer in order to work through contract labour as mentioned under section 7 of the act.

Important Points

  • It is not applicable to the establishment in which the work is only of an intermittent or casual nature. 

Related Questions

The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: India’s telecom watchdog has suggested regulation of all entities dealing with consumer data—devices such as iPhones, operating systems such as Android, browsers like Google’s Chrome and apps such as Facebook, Paytm, Uber or Zomato— by bringing them under licence conditions that apply to telecom service providers until a general data protection law is put in place by the government. Which of the following argument weakens the above statement in the best possible manner? Arguments: I. The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai) said the framework for protection of personal information is ‘not sufficient’ and that the issue of data ownership, privacy, and security is complex and multi-dimensional. It suggested expanding the ambit of licence conditions governing telcos to all entities handling customer information and empowerment of customers to keep their data secure. II. The telecom watchdog further said that individual users owned their data, or personal information, and entities such as devices were ‘mere custodians’ and do not have primary rights over that information. III. Telcos and internet service providers (ISPs) though welcomed recommendations that sought to bring app makers under the same regulations. However, content providers have been opposed to being brought under more regulation.