Who coined the phrase 'Unity in Diversity' to describe India?

Who coined the phrase 'Unity in Diversity' to describe India? Correct Answer Jawaharlal Nehru

'Unity in diversity' is a popular phrase that is used to denote the idea of unity in (spite of) differences in cultures, language, religions, etc. 

Important Points

Unity in Diversity term coined by Jawaharlal Nehru, the First Prime Minister of India.

  • He used this term in his book "The Discovery of India" In 1946.
  • In his book, he described the strength and unity of the whole nation.  

Additional Information

  • B. R. Ambedkar was elected as the chairman of the drafting committee that was constituted by the Constituent Assembly to draft a constitution for independent India.
  • M. K. Gandhi wrote his autobiography "My Experiments With Truth". He started the satyagraha movement and Dandi march.
  • Rajendra Prasad was the first president of India. He was awarded as Bharat Ratna award in 1962.

Hence, from the above-mentioned points, it becomes clear that Jawaharlal Nehru coined the phrase 'Unity in Diversity' to describe India.

Related Questions

Who coined the phrase "Unity in Diversity" to describe India?
Who among the following national leaders coined the phrase ‘Unity in Diversity’ to describe the Indian Nation-State?
“In India there is unity in diversity and diversity in unity.” Whose statement is this?
Who coined the phrase Unity in Diversity?
Read the passage carefully and choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives.
Doing an internship at the University of Lille in France, I almost always found myself stuck whenever I had to speak to non-Indians about India or on anything'Indian'. This was more because of the subtle differences in the way the French understood India in comparison to what I thought was 'Indian'. For instance, when I,or any Indian for that matter, say 'Hindi' is an Indian language, what it means is that it is one of the languages widely spoken in India. This need not be similar tothe understanding that the French would have when they hear of 'Hindi' as an Indian language. Because for them Hindi then becomes the only language spoken inIndia. This is a natural inference that the French, Germans, Italians and many other European nationals would tend to make, because that is generally how it is intheir own respective countries. The risk of such inappropriate generalisations made about 'Indian' is not restricted to language alone but also for India's landscape,cuisine, movies, music, climate, economic development and even political ideologies. The magnitude of diversity of one European country can be easily compared tothat of one of the Indian State, isn't it? Can they imagine that India is one country whose diversity can be equated to that of the entire European continent? Theonus is upon us to go ahead and clarify the nuances in 'Indianness' while we converse. But why should one do so? How does it even matter to clarify? What wrong with respect to India are the Europeans responsible for?
Read the passage carefully and choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives.
Doing an internship at the University of Lille in France, I almost always found myself stuck whenever I had to speak to non-Indians about India or on anything'Indian'. This was more because of the subtle differences in the way the French understood India in comparison to what I thought was 'Indian'. For instance, when I,or any Indian for that matter, say 'Hindi' is an Indian language, what it means is that it is one of the languages widely spoken in India. This need not be similar tothe understanding that the French would have when they hear of 'Hindi' as an Indian language. Because for them Hindi then becomes the only language spoken inIndia. This is a natural inference that the French, Germans, Italians and many other European nationals would tend to make, because that is generally how it is intheir own respective countries. The risk of such inappropriate generalisations made about 'Indian' is not restricted to language alone but also for India's landscape,cuisine, movies, music, climate, economic development and even political ideologies. The magnitude of diversity of one European country can be easily compared tothat of one of the Indian State, isn't it? Can they imagine that India is one country whose diversity can be equated to that of the entire European continent? Theonus is upon us to go ahead and clarify the nuances in 'Indianness' while we converse. But why should one do so? How does it even matter to clarify? According to the writer the responsibility of explaining the facts about India to Europeans rests with?