Who coined the phrase "Unity in Diversity" to describe India?

Who coined the phrase "Unity in Diversity" to describe India? Correct Answer Jawaharlal Nehru 

Important Points

  • The phrase ‘unity in diversity’ is coined by Jawaharlal Nehru.
  • This term is very appropriate to describe India, which is, in spite of being diverse with many languages, religions, castes, creed etc.
  • There is a feeling of oneness among people.
  • The phrase was used by Jawaharlal Nehru in his book ‘Discovery of India’.

Additional Information

  •  Jawaharlal Nehru created the phrase ‘unity in diversity’. This word perfectly describes India, which, despite its diversity of languages, faiths, castes, and creeds, has a strong sense of unity among its citizens. Jawaharlal Nehru used the phrase in his book ‘Discovery of India’.
  • Jawaharlal Nehru wants the people of India to realise that we should respect the viewpoints of all citizens and not create divisions based on culture, religion, language, or customs.

Related Questions

Who coined the phrase 'Unity in Diversity' to describe India?
Who among the following national leaders coined the phrase ‘Unity in Diversity’ to describe the Indian Nation-State?
“In India there is unity in diversity and diversity in unity.” Whose statement is this?
Who coined the phrase Unity in Diversity?
Read the passage carefully and choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives.
Doing an internship at the University of Lille in France, I almost always found myself stuck whenever I had to speak to non-Indians about India or on anything'Indian'. This was more because of the subtle differences in the way the French understood India in comparison to what I thought was 'Indian'. For instance, when I,or any Indian for that matter, say 'Hindi' is an Indian language, what it means is that it is one of the languages widely spoken in India. This need not be similar tothe understanding that the French would have when they hear of 'Hindi' as an Indian language. Because for them Hindi then becomes the only language spoken inIndia. This is a natural inference that the French, Germans, Italians and many other European nationals would tend to make, because that is generally how it is intheir own respective countries. The risk of such inappropriate generalisations made about 'Indian' is not restricted to language alone but also for India's landscape,cuisine, movies, music, climate, economic development and even political ideologies. The magnitude of diversity of one European country can be easily compared tothat of one of the Indian State, isn't it? Can they imagine that India is one country whose diversity can be equated to that of the entire European continent? Theonus is upon us to go ahead and clarify the nuances in 'Indianness' while we converse. But why should one do so? How does it even matter to clarify? What wrong with respect to India are the Europeans responsible for?
Read the passage carefully and choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives.
Doing an internship at the University of Lille in France, I almost always found myself stuck whenever I had to speak to non-Indians about India or on anything'Indian'. This was more because of the subtle differences in the way the French understood India in comparison to what I thought was 'Indian'. For instance, when I,or any Indian for that matter, say 'Hindi' is an Indian language, what it means is that it is one of the languages widely spoken in India. This need not be similar tothe understanding that the French would have when they hear of 'Hindi' as an Indian language. Because for them Hindi then becomes the only language spoken inIndia. This is a natural inference that the French, Germans, Italians and many other European nationals would tend to make, because that is generally how it is intheir own respective countries. The risk of such inappropriate generalisations made about 'Indian' is not restricted to language alone but also for India's landscape,cuisine, movies, music, climate, economic development and even political ideologies. The magnitude of diversity of one European country can be easily compared tothat of one of the Indian State, isn't it? Can they imagine that India is one country whose diversity can be equated to that of the entire European continent? Theonus is upon us to go ahead and clarify the nuances in 'Indianness' while we converse. But why should one do so? How does it even matter to clarify? According to the writer the responsibility of explaining the facts about India to Europeans rests with?