Torts of conspiracy occur where:-

Match list - I with list - II and choose the correct answer from the code given below - List - I List - II (A) Howrah Conspiracy case (i) Master Ami Chand (Amir Chand) (B) Lahore Conspiracy case (ii) Arvind Ghosh (C) Delhi Conspiracy case (iii) Jatindranath Mukherjee (D) Alipore Conspiracy case (iv) Rajguru

A

A-(iv), B-(iii), C-(ii), D-(i)

B

A-(i), B-(ii), C-(iii), D-(iv)

C

A-(iii), B-(iv), C-(i), D-(ii)

D

A-(ii), B-(iii), C-(iv), D-(i)

In which among the following cases malice becomes relevant to determine a person's liability in law of torts. Answer by using below:
(1) Malice may result in aggravation of damages
(2) It torts of deceit and conspiracy one of the essential is malice
(3) When act is lawful, intention can be gathered from past circumstances
(4) Causing of personal comfort by lawful means may tum lawful act into a tort

A

(1) and (2)

B

(1) and (3)

C

(1), (2) and (3)

D

(1), (2), (3) and (4)

Which of the following statements are correct in relation to criminal conspiracy?
1. When two or more persons agree to do an unlawful act by an unlawful means then they will be guilty of criminal conspiracy
2. Several persons agreed to commit an "offence" but nothing was done in pursuance of the agreement
3. When two or more persons agree to do a lawful act in lawful manner by lawful means but an overt act is done by one them
4. Criminal conspiracy to commit and offence punishable with fine alone will not entail any liability
Select the correct answer:

A

1, 3 and 4

B

2, 3 and 4

C

1, 2 and 4

D

1, 2 and 3

The offence of criminal conspiracy lies not in doing the act of effecting the purposes for which the conspiracy is formed but in the forming of the scheme between the parties. A criminal conspiracy consists of:

A

An intentional act of one person with the connivance of another

B

An agreement of two or more persons to do an unlawful act or a lawful act by unlawful means

C

Common intention of two or more persons to achieve an unlawful object

D

Two or more persons inducing a minor to commit an offence

Bird v. Jones, 1845 KB is a case in the law of torts which is related with the torts of

A

Assault and battery

B

False imprisonment

C

Conspiracy

D

Defamation

Which of the following is correct?
Answer by using the below:
(1) Corporation is vicariously liable for acts done by its employees.
(2) Minor is liable for the torts committed by him.
(3) Wife is liable under law of torts to her husband if she negligently fractures his legs.
(4) Tort committed by any partner in the ordinary course of business of firm all other partners are liable.

A

(1), (2), (3) and (4)

B

(1), (2) and (3)

C

(1), (2) and (4)

D

(1) and (4)

Assertion (A): Government cannot be held liable for the torts committed by its servants.
Reason (R): A master is liable for the torts committed by his servant in the course of his employment.

A

Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A

B

Both A and R are true but R is not a correct explanation of A

C

A is true but R is false

D

A is false but R is true

The 'Principle of Respondent Superior' under the law of torts is related with the torts of

A

Negligence

B

Nuisance

C

Vicarious liability

D

Strict liability

X and Y conspire to poison Z. X in pursuance of the conspiracy procures the poison and delivers it to Y in order that he may administer it to Z. Y in pursuance of the conspiracy administers the poison in the presence of X and hereby causes Z's death. What offence, if any has been committed by X and Y, respectively?

A

Y has committed the offence of murder and X was an abettor

B

Both X and Y have committed the offence of criminal conspiracy

C

X has committed the offence of murder and Y was an abettor

D

Both X and Y have committed the offence of murder

What is the basic difference between an offence of abetment by conspiracy and the offence of criminal conspiracy?

A

In case of conspiracy, mere agreement is enough whereas in case of abetment by conspiracy an act should have taken place in pursuance of conspiracy

B

There is no difference at all

C

In case of conspiracy, an act should also have taken place, but in case of abetment by conspiracy, no act needs to have taken place

D

In case of abetment by conspiracy, there need not be an agreement whereas in case of criminal conspiracy, agreement is essential

Torts of conspiracy occur where:-

Related Questions