Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Related Questions

In the question below are given three statements followed by four conclusions I, II, III and IV. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: All lion are bird. All bird are pig. Some pig are hen. Conclusions: I. Some bird being hen is possibility. II. All bird are hen. III. Some lion are bird. IV. No pig is bird.
A boy standing on the road observes a bird flying in east at an angle of 30°. After some time, he observes the same bird in the west at an angle of 60°. If the bird is flying at a constant height and distance covered by bird is 400 m, find the height at which bird is flying.
The 'Principle of Respondent Superior' under the law of torts is related with the torts of
What was Indiana Jones searching for in Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade?
Which of the following is correct?
Answer by using the below:
(1) Corporation is vicariously liable for acts done by its employees.
(2) Minor is liable for the torts committed by him.
(3) Wife is liable under law of torts to her husband if she negligently fractures his legs.
(4) Tort committed by any partner in the ordinary course of business of firm all other partners are liable.
In which among the following cases malice becomes relevant to determine a person's liability in law of torts. Answer by using below:
(1) Malice may result in aggravation of damages
(2) It torts of deceit and conspiracy one of the essential is malice
(3) When act is lawful, intention can be gathered from past circumstances
(4) Causing of personal comfort by lawful means may tum lawful act into a tort
What is the printout of the following switch statement? char ch = 'a'; switch (ch){ case 'a': case 'A': System.out.print(ch); break; case 'b': case 'B': System.out.print(ch); break; case 'c': case 'C': System.out.print(ch); break; case 'd': case 'D': System.out.print(ch); }
What is the printout of the following switch statement?
char ch = 'a'; switch (ch){ case 'a': case 'A': System.out.print(ch); break; case 'b': case 'B': System.out.print(ch); break; case 'c': case 'C': System.out.print(ch); break; case 'd': case 'D': System.out.print(ch);}
Given below are two statements, one labelled as Assertion (A) and the other labelled as Reason (R). Read the statements and choose the correct answer:
Assertion (A): Austinian theory of law does not properly explain constitutional law, customary law and judicial precedents.
Reason (R): Constitutional law, customary law and judicial precedents do not share the same pedigree as statutory law.
Assertion (A): Government cannot be held liable for the torts committed by its servants.
Reason (R): A master is liable for the torts committed by his servant in the course of his employment.