Law Of Torts MCQ
Test your knowledge with important Law Of Torts MCQ and their applications. These MCQs are beneficial for competitive exams too. Explore 30+ more Law Of Torts MCQs on Bissoy. Bissoy App
-
Nuisance' is interference with a person's right relating to
-
A civil wrong is one which gives rise to
-
Torts of conspiracy occur where:-
-
For defamation
-
With regard to the contractual capacity of a person of unsound mind, which one of the following statements is most appropriate?
-
When the plaintiff himself is a wrongdoer, he is not disentitled from recovering in tort unless some unlawful act or conduct on hisown part is connected with the harm suffered by him as part of the same transaction' is stated by
-
In which of the following cases, Lord Wilberforce opined that "It is necessary to consider three elements inherent in any claim for nervous shock: the class of persons whose claim should be recognized, the proximity of such persons to the incident and the means adopted by which shock is caused"?
-
The joint liability in respect of joint tort-feasors arises in which one of the following circumstances?<br>1. Agency, when one person employs another to do an act which turns out to be a tort.<br>2. Vicarious liability, i.e., the liability arising from relations.<br>3. Joint action - where two or more persons combine together to commit an act which amounts to a tort.<br>Select the correct answer using the given below:
-
Which statement is correct for an act of tort?
-
Match List-I with List-II with regard to tort of nuisance and answer by using below:<br>
-
Vicarious liability commensurates with that of
-
When the negligence of two or more persons results in the same damage, this is called
-
The "Absolute liability" theory as the basis for liability in tort for industrial injuries was propounded by:
-
The concept of absolute liability was developed by the Supreme Court of India in M. C. Mehta v. Union of India, the judgment of which was delivered by:
-
The essential characteristics of tort is, violation of
-
X' was working at a place over which a crane swung carrying heavy stones. Both 'X' and his employer knew that the crane so swung and recognized the possibility of danger if a stone fell from the crane. No warning was given 'X' of the swinging time of the crane whenever this took place. Once a heavy stone fell from the swinging crane and injured 'X'. In a claim for torts, the employer pleaded that there was no liability on the basis of the principle volenti non fit injuria. This plea-
-
For fixing vicarious liability of master in tort for the wrongs committed by servant, master servant relationship is determined on the basis of:
-
A' was carelessly driving his car at 50 km/hr. at a busy street in the city and hit B injuring his leg. On these facts the Supreme Court of India held that 'A' is liable to pay compensation to 'B'. It means that the Supreme Court laid down the law that the injured party is entitled for compensation in all cases of:
-
In the case of a libel or slander of a partnership firm
-
A was riding his bicycle on a rainy day on a road which had no street lights. He came in contact with a live wire lying on the road which was inundated with water and got electrocuted. A's wife brought an action against the Electricity Board for negligence.
-
One X wrote defamatory letter against Y, a copy of which he sent to the Chairman of the Municipal Committee and other for publication in a local newspaper in which it was duly published. Y sued X and the editor, publisher and management of the newspaper for damages. Subsequently, a sum of Rs. 5,000 was paid by the newspaper by way of damages to Y and an apology was also published in the newspaper. Thereupon Y withdrew his action against the newspaper but not against X. X pleads that the release of other joint tort-feasors amounted to his release also
-
Principle: A common carrier owes to its passengers the highest degree of care which a prudent man would be expected to exercise under similar circumstances.<br>Facts: A couple entered the premises of an amusement park after obtaining a ticket for entry and paid the special fare for the roller coaster ride. The lady received an electrical shock while she and her husband were boarding the roller coaster. She had to be admitted in the hospital for treatment. Her husband moves the court against the operator of the ride.<br>Is the operator of the ride liable?
-
As a result of a collision between two buses a passenger in one of the buses died. The accident occurred due to negligence of the drivers of both the buses. In a suit by the legal representative of the deceased against owners of both the buses, which one of the following statements is legally sustainable?
-
Two dogs belonging to two different owners acting in concert attacked a flock of sheep and injured several sheep. In an action for damages brought against the owners of the dogs, if one of them put in defence claiming that he was liable for one-half only of the damage, then which one of the following statements is legally sustainable in the above case?
-
The defendants, employees of the Municipal Corporation opened a main hole in the street and in the evening left the mainhole open and covered it by a canvas shelter, unattended and surrounded by warning lamps. The plaintiff, an eight year old boy, took one of the lamps into the shelter and was playing with it there,when he stumbled over it and it fell into the mainhole. A violent explosion followed and the plaintiff sustained bum injuries. The defendants are:
-
In public nuisance, a private right of action lies:
-
Which one of the following is a correct statement?<br>Nuisance recognises:
-
Transfer of a chattel under a contract, the liability shall be regulated
-
Act of State means
-
If a person wants to bring an action under Law of Torts for the tort of public nuisance, he must have to prove that