Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

If a person wants to bring an action under Law of Torts for the tort of public nuisance, he must have to prove that

If a person wants to bring an action under Law of Torts for the tort of public nuisance, he must have to prove that Correct Answer The injury was direct and substantial only to him

Related Questions

To prove both the parts of the offence contemplated in Section 116 of the Indian Penal Code, which of the following must be proved by the prosecution?
1. To prove the first part, the accused did abet the offence either by instigation or by conspiracy or by intentional aiding or by illegal omission.
2. To prove the first part, the offence was such which is punishable with imprisonment.
3. To prove the second part, the person abetted was a public servant during the period he was abetted.
4. To prove the second part, it was the duty of such public servant to prevent the commission of such an offence.
Which of the following statement/s is/are correct? Answer by using the below:
(1) In tort duty is imposed by law and is owed to the community at large
(2) A tort is founded upon consent of parties
(3) A tort is civil wrong for which the remedy is a common law action for liquidated damages
(4) In tort 'motive' for the violation of right is immaterial.
Which of the following statement/statements is/are correct? Give correct answer by using the given below:
(1) Tort is a civil wrong for which remedy is a common law action.
(2) Tort is exclusively a breach of contract or breach of trust.
(3) Tort is an infringement of a right in rein of a private individual.
(4) Tort is violation of a legal duty owed to people generally for maintenance of law and order.
Which two classes use the Shape class correctly?
A. public class Circle implements Shape { private int radius; }B. public abstract class Circle extends Shape { private int radius; }C. public class Circle extends Shape { private int radius; public void draw(); }D. public abstract class Circle implements Shape { private int radius; public void draw(); }E. public class Circle extends Shape { private int radius; public void draw() { /* code here */ } }F. public abstract class Circle implements Shape { private int radius; public void draw() { /* code here */ } }
Consider the following statements:
1. In tort, the duty is towards specific person
2. The nature of the wrong is similar in tort and crime
3. In tort, the duty is primarily fixed by the parties
4. The general remedy in tort is an action for injunction
Which of the above statements is/are correct?
Which of the following statements are correct?
1. In tort, the duties are imposed by law whereas in contract, duties are undertaken by the parties themselves.
2. In tort, the duty is towards the world at large but in contract, the duty is towards specific individual or individuals.
3. In tort, damages are liquidated but in contract, the damages are unliquidated.
4. In tort, a person may be liable for the wrongs committed by others also but in contract, the liability governs the parties to the contract only.
Select the correct answer using the given below:
Consider the following statements:
1. To bring an action for damages in respect of a public nuisance by a private individual, the injury must be direct and not merely consequential
2. Private nuisance may be with respect to property or personal physical discomfort.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
what is the result of the following piece of code: public class Person{ public void talk(){ System.out.print("I am a Person"); } } public class Student extends Person{ public void talk(){ System.out.print("I am a Student"); } } public class Test{ public static void main(String args[]){ Person p = new Student(); p.talk(); } }
Assertion (A): Public and private nuisance are not in reality two species of the same genus at all. Obstruction of a highways is public nuisance but an individual can sue on proof of special damages to him.
Reason (R): Negligence is a necessary condition of a claim for nuisance and the latter is a breach of the former.
In which among the following cases malice becomes relevant to determine a person's liability in law of torts. Answer by using below:
(1) Malice may result in aggravation of damages
(2) It torts of deceit and conspiracy one of the essential is malice
(3) When act is lawful, intention can be gathered from past circumstances
(4) Causing of personal comfort by lawful means may tum lawful act into a tort