What is the basic difference between an offence of abetment by conspiracy and the offence of criminal conspiracy?

Abetment may include:
1 Abetment by instigation
2. Abetment by conspiracy
3. Abetment by aid
4. Abetment by acquiescence and
5. Abetment by silence:

A

Only the first three constitute abetment

B

All the five constitute abetment

C

Only the first four amount to abetment

D

Only 2, 4 and 5 amount to abetment

Which of the following statements are correct in relation to criminal conspiracy?
1. When two or more persons agree to do an unlawful act by an unlawful means then they will be guilty of criminal conspiracy
2. Several persons agreed to commit an "offence" but nothing was done in pursuance of the agreement
3. When two or more persons agree to do a lawful act in lawful manner by lawful means but an overt act is done by one them
4. Criminal conspiracy to commit and offence punishable with fine alone will not entail any liability
Select the correct answer:

A

1, 3 and 4

B

2, 3 and 4

C

1, 2 and 4

D

1, 2 and 3

The offence of criminal conspiracy lies not in doing the act of effecting the purposes for which the conspiracy is formed but in the forming of the scheme between the parties. A criminal conspiracy consists of:

A

An intentional act of one person with the connivance of another

B

An agreement of two or more persons to do an unlawful act or a lawful act by unlawful means

C

Common intention of two or more persons to achieve an unlawful object

D

Two or more persons inducing a minor to commit an offence

An advocate who is accused-
1. Of a criminal offence is entitled to conduct his own defence
2. Of a criminal offence is not entitled to conduct his own defence
3. With others of a criminal offence is not entitled to appear at the trial as counsel for his co-accused
4. With others of a criminal offence is entitled to appear at the trial as counsel for his co-accused

A

1 and 3

B

1 and 4

C

2 and 3

D

2 and 4

Match list - I with list - II and choose the correct answer from the code given below - List - I List - II (A) Howrah Conspiracy case (i) Master Ami Chand (Amir Chand) (B) Lahore Conspiracy case (ii) Arvind Ghosh (C) Delhi Conspiracy case (iii) Jatindranath Mukherjee (D) Alipore Conspiracy case (iv) Rajguru

A

A-(iv), B-(iii), C-(ii), D-(i)

B

A-(i), B-(ii), C-(iii), D-(iv)

C

A-(iii), B-(iv), C-(i), D-(ii)

D

A-(ii), B-(iii), C-(iv), D-(i)

Abetment of any offence, punishable with imprisonment, if the offence be not committed in consequence of the abetment is dealt under

A

Section 114 of Indian Penal Code

B

Section 115 of Indian Penal Code

C

Section 116 of Indian Penal Code

D

Section 117 of Indian Penal Code

(A) For the purpose of offence of abetment, it is not necessary that the act abetted must be committed.
(R) Abetment is offence per se.

A

Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)

B

Both (A) and (R) are true but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)

C

(A) is true and (R) is false

D

Both (A) and (R) are false

Abetment of any offence, punishable with death or imprisonment for life, if the offence be not committed in consequence of the abetment is dealt under-

A

Section 115 of Indian Penal Code

B

Section 116 of Indian Penal Code

C

Section 117 of Indian Penal Code

D

Section 118 of Indian Penal Code

Whoever is a party to a criminal conspiracy other than a criminal conspiracy to commit an offence punishable is dealt under-

A

Section 118B of Indian Penal Code

B

Section 119B of Indian Penal Code

C

Section 120B of Indian Penal Code

D

Section 121B of Indian Penal Code

Abetment of an offence, punishable with death or imprisonment for life if an act, which causes harm to be done in consequence of the abetment is dealt under-

A

Section 115 of Indian Penal Code

B

Section 116 of Indian Penal Code

C

Section 117 of Indian Penal Code

D

Section 118 of Indian Penal Code

What is the basic difference between an offence of abetment by conspiracy and the offence of criminal conspiracy?

Related Questions