Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Consider the following statements:
1. A Circus Company keeps wild animals and trains them. One of them escapes and causes injury to a spectator. Company is not liable.
2. A person who brings and keeps any dangerous thing, keeps it at his risk, if it escapes and causes damages he is liable. Of these statements

Consider the following statements:
1. A Circus Company keeps wild animals and trains them. One of them escapes and causes injury to a spectator. Company is not liable.
2. A person who brings and keeps any dangerous thing, keeps it at his risk, if it escapes and causes damages he is liable. Of these statements Correct Answer 1 is false but 2 is true

Related Questions

Which one of the following is the ratio decidendi of the case of Rylands v. Fletcher?
1. A person is liable if he brings on his land some dangerous thing
2. The liability arises not because there was any fault on the person but because he kept some dangerous thing on his land
3. Even if the defendant was not negligent in causing the harm, he could still be made liable under the rule
4. A person, who for his own purposes brings on his lands and keeps there anything which is likely to do mischief if it escapes, is prima facie answerable for the damage which is the natural consequence of its escape.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
A, B, C, D, E, F and G are seven coaches. Each one among them is a coach of a different game. The games are Hockey, Cricket, Badminton, Tennis, Volleyball, Basketball and Football (not necessarily in the same order). Each of them trains on one of the seven days of the week from Monday to Sunday (not necessarily in the same order). No two coaches train on the same day of the week. C trains Badminton on Friday. B teaches Volleyball on the previous day of the day on which a coach trains Hockey. G trains on Sunday but does not train Cricket or Tennis. D trains Basketball on the previous day of the day on which F trains. A trains Football on Tuesday. E does not train Tennis. On which day does F train?
In the following question, the 1st and the last part of the sentence/passage are numbered 1 and 6. The rest of the sentence/ passage is split into four parts and named P, Q, R and S. These four parts are not given in their proper order. Read the sentence/passage and find out which of the four combinations is correct. 1. A few countries already use powerful electromagnets to build high-speed trains. P. Since maglev trains float in the air, there is no friction between the train and the track. Q. Maglev trains work on the principles of magnetism and float over a guideway. R. Maglev is the shortened form of magnetic levitation. S. These trains are called maglev trains. 6. This lack of friction and the aerodynamic design of these trains allow them to reach speeds of over 500 kilometers per hour.
Due to the technical snag in the signal system two trains start approaching each other on the same track from two different stations, 240 km away each other. When the train starts a bird also starts moving to and fro between the two trains at 60 kmph touching each train each time. The bird initially sitting on the top of the engine of one of the trains and it moves so till these trains collide. If these trains collide one and half hour after start, then how many kilometers bird travels till the time of collision of trains?
Anjum is counting his last days, he keeps half his property for his wife and divides the rest equally among his three sons: Bimar, Cumar and Danger. Some years later, Bimar dies, leaving half his property to his widow and half to his brothers, Cumar and Danger together, sharing equally. When Cumar makes his will, he keeps half his property for his widow and the rest he bequeaths to his younger brother Danger. When Danger dies some years later, he keeps half his property for his widow and the remaining for his mother. The mother now has Rs. 1575000. What was the worth of the total property?
Consider the following statements:
For making occupier or owner of a land liable on the basis of strict liability rule certain essential factors are:
1. Keeping of a dangerous thing on his land.
2. non-natural use of land.
3. use of thing for common benefit.
4. escape of thing from his control.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
Principle: If an injury is the result of a reasonably foreseeable cause, the person/authority responsible is liable for damages because he has a duty to take reasonable measures to prevent it.
Facts: Janet, a housewife standing at her balcony, was struck on the head by a ball that flew out of a cricket field across her home. Janet sues the District Cricket Association (DCA), the owner of the cricket field for public nuisance and negligence on the ground that the field did not have a fence high enough to prevent such occurrence. District Cricket Association (DCA) claims that only about 10 balls had escaped the field in the previous 10 years and it was therefore an unforeseeable risk. Is there a duty on the part of the District Cricket Association (DCA) to prevent the risk? Is the District Cricket Association (DCA) liable to compensate Janet?
What is the expected output? class Animal { Animal() { System.out.println("Animal"); } } class Wild extends Animal{ Wild() { System.out.println("Wild"); super(); } } public class Test { public static void main(String args[]) { Wild wild = new Wild(); } }
Captain Jack Sparrow, on his death bed, keeps half his property for this wife and divides the rest equally among his three sons: Barbossa, Will Turner and Dave. Some years later, Barbossa dies leaving half his property to his widow and half to his brothers Will Turner and Dave together, sharing equally. When Will Turner makes his will, he keeps half his property for his widow and the rest he bequeaths to his younger brother Dave. When Dave dies some years later, he keeps half his property for his widow and the remaining for his mother. The mother now has Rs. 1,575,000.What was the worth of the total property?
In each of the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements. Statements: I. All insects are dangerous. II. All machines are dangerous. Conclusions: I. All dangerous are insects. II. All dangerous are machines. III. Some machines are insects.