Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Related Questions

Consider the 5 × 5 matrix \[{\text{A}} = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} 1&2&3&4&5 \\ 5&1&2&3&4 \\ 4&5&1&2&3 \\ 3&4&5&1&2 \\ 2&3&4&5&1 \end{array}} \right
Select from the alternatives that combination of numbers, which will form a meaningful word if given letters are arranged accordingly. \(\begin{matrix} \ \ \ \text{A} & \rm R & \rm W & \rm L & \rm E & \rm K \\\ \downarrow & \downarrow & \downarrow & \downarrow & \downarrow & \downarrow \\\ \ \ 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 \end{matrix}\)
Eigen values of the matrix \[\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} 0&1&0&0 \\ 1&0&0&0 \\ 0&0&0&{ - 2i} \\ 0&0&{2i}&0 \end{array}} \right
Let A be an m × n matrix and Ban n × m matrix. It is given that determinant ($$I$$m + AB) = determinant ($$I$$n + BA), where $$I$$k is the k × k identity matrix. Using the above property, the determinant of the matrix given below is
\[\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} 2&1&1&1 \\ 1&2&1&1 \\ 1&1&2&1 \\ 1&1&1&2 \end{array}} \right
In a coded language “ADETP” is coded as “$&$&&” and “DTPQUV” is coded as “&&&&$&”? What is the code word for “&&$$&$”?
Assertion (A): Where any special or local law prescribes for any suit appeal or application a period of limitation different from period prescribed by the Schedule, the provisions of Section 3 of Limitation Act, 1963 shall apply as if such period were the period prescribed by the schedule.
Reason (R): Where a Special Law prescribes a period of limitation for filing appeal but there is no provision therefore under Limitation Act, 1963, the period of limitation provided under the Special Law must be treated to be different from that under the Limitation Act.
For what value of x, y and z matrices A and B are equal \(A = \begin{bmatrix} 2 & 0 & x+3 \\\ y-4 & 4 & 6 \end{bmatrix} ; \ \ B = \begin{bmatrix} 2 & 0 & 6 \\\ -2 & 4 & 2z \end{bmatrix}\)
In the following question, select the number which can be placed at the sign of question mark (?) from the given alternatives. \(\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} 5&1&3\\ 9&9&4\\ 6&?&7\\ {29}&{22}&{18} \end{array}\)
In which of the following case, the court has held that limitation period as provided in the Limitation Act, 1963 would extend seven years by virtue of Section 39 of the Limitation Act, since a period of 30 years. Thus making Limitation period for redemption of Mortgage as 37 years
In which of the following cases the Calcutta High Court held that "Though Limitation of 1 year as provided in Contempt of Courts Act, in fit case provisions of section 5 and 17 of Limitation Act can be applied by virtue of section 29(2)of Limitation Act"?