Under which section of Evidence Act, a tenant of immovable property is estopped from denying a title of the landlord to that property?

A tenant or licencee under section 116 of Evidence Act is estopped from denying the title of landlord

A

During the continuance of tenancy

B

After the creation of tenancy or licence

C

After the surrender of possession under tenancy or licence

D

All the above

During continuance of possession of immovable property the person in possession is estopped from denying the title to such immovable property of the person who put him in such possession, if:

A

The possession is as a tenant

B

The possession is as a licencee

C

The person in possession is in unauthorized occupation

D

Both A and B

The expression "holding over" under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 is used in the sense of retaining possession. A distinction is made between a tenant continuing in possession after the determination of the lease without the consent of the landlord, and a tenant doing so with the landlord's consent:

A

The former is called a "tenant by sufferance" and the latter class of tenants is called "tenant holding over a tenant at will"

B

The former is called "tenant holding over a tenant at will" and latter is called "tenant by sufferance"

C

Former is called sub-tenant latter is called forfeiture lessor

D

None of the above

Under Section 116 of the Indian Evidence Act, the tenant is stopped from denying the title of the landlord

A

During the continuance of the tenancy

B

Before creation of tenancy

C

After surrender of possession

D

All these

A tenant of an immovable property can deny title of the landlord to such immovable property:

A

After the tenant vacates the property

B

If landlord is not the actual owner

C

If landlord had trespassed into the property and his title is defective

D

In all cases covered by clauses (a) to (c)

In which of the following case, the Supreme Court held that "Once the period of lease expires, the relationship of landlord and tenant ceases, and the tenant becomes a trespasser and, therefore, there is no question of service of any notice under Section 106 Transfer of Property Act"?

A

Shanti Devi v. Amal Kumar Banjerjee, AIR 1981 SC 1550

B

P. C. Cheriyan v. Barfi Devi, (1980) 2 SCC 461

C

ldandas v. Anant Ramm Chandra Phadke, AIR 1982 SC 127

D

None of the above

Under section 116 of Evidence Act, the tenant is estopped

A

From denying the title to the property, of the landlord

B

From denying the title to the property, of the actual owner

C

Both A and B

D

Only and not A

Mere agreement to sell the leased property to tenant would not terminate the landlord - tenant relationship was held by supreme court in which judgement:

A

Dr. H. K. Sharma v Shri Ram Lal

B

Dharam Singh v Prem Singh

C

Shivnarayan (D) by LRs v Maniklal (D) by LRs

D

None

Under Section 116 of the Evidence Act, the tenant is stopped from denying

A

This title to the property of the actual owner

B

The title to the property of the landlord

C

Both A and B

D

None of these

Choice the correct propositions:
1. Evidence of fingerprint expert is substantive evidence.
2. Evidence of fingerprint expert can be used only to corroborate some items of substantive evidence which are otherwise on record.
3. Evidence of fingerprint expert is not substantive evidence.
4. Evidence of fingerprint expert is admissible in all circumstances as expert evidence.

A

1 and 2 are true

B

2 and 3 are true

C

3 and 4 are true

D

2 and 4 are true

Under which section of Evidence Act, a tenant of immovable property is estopped from denying a title of the landlord to that property?

Related Questions