A tenant of an immovable property can deny title of the landlord to such immovable property:

The expression "holding over" under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 is used in the sense of retaining possession. A distinction is made between a tenant continuing in possession after the determination of the lease without the consent of the landlord, and a tenant doing so with the landlord's consent:

A

The former is called a "tenant by sufferance" and the latter class of tenants is called "tenant holding over a tenant at will"

B

The former is called "tenant holding over a tenant at will" and latter is called "tenant by sufferance"

C

Former is called sub-tenant latter is called forfeiture lessor

D

None of the above

Under which section of Evidence Act, a tenant of immovable property is estopped from denying a title of the landlord to that property?

A

Section 115

B

Section 116

C

Section 117

D

None of the above

In which of the following case, the Supreme Court held that "Once the period of lease expires, the relationship of landlord and tenant ceases, and the tenant becomes a trespasser and, therefore, there is no question of service of any notice under Section 106 Transfer of Property Act"?

A

Shanti Devi v. Amal Kumar Banjerjee, AIR 1981 SC 1550

B

P. C. Cheriyan v. Barfi Devi, (1980) 2 SCC 461

C

ldandas v. Anant Ramm Chandra Phadke, AIR 1982 SC 127

D

None of the above

Mere agreement to sell the leased property to tenant would not terminate the landlord - tenant relationship was held by supreme court in which judgement:

A

Dr. H. K. Sharma v Shri Ram Lal

B

Dharam Singh v Prem Singh

C

Shivnarayan (D) by LRs v Maniklal (D) by LRs

D

None

In a suit for possession by the landlord against his tenant, a sub-tenant is a

A

Necessary party

B

Proper party

C

Both A and B

D

None of the above

If no specific place is agreed regarding payment of rent between landlord and tenant then the tenant will pay the rent:

A

In the business place of the landlord

B

In the residential house of the landlord

C

The landlord will come to the tenant and receive

D

Rent will be deposited in Bank account of landlord

Section 114 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, affords protection to the tenant against forfeiture while the tenant enjoys the immunity from eviction for default in the payment of rent, the land lord gets the corresponding benefit of recovery even of such areas as are not legally recoverable. Such an equitable provision as is engrafted shall govern only to such an extent which does not run counter to any specific statutory provision. This was held in:

A

Shyam Bhagwan Dubey v. Shaikh Nizam, AIR 1994 MP 52

B

Prithivichand Ramchand Sablok v. S. Y. Shinde, AIR 1993 SC 1929

C

Vasant Kumar Radhakrishan v. Board of Trustees of Port of Bombay, AIR 1991 SC 14

D

Ramesh Kumar Jha v. Official Assignee, High Court of Bombay, AIR 1993 Bom 374

In a suit for partition, a Memorandum of Family Settlement is filed and on this basis the partition suit is decreed, but even after disposal of the suit the original Memorandum of Family Settlement remains in the file of the partition suit, then in such situation whether in a suit for eviction by one of the original co-owner of a tenant of a shop of the joint property which has fallen to the share of that co-owner as per the decree passed on the Memorandum of Family Settlement, can the certified copy of the Memorandum of Family Settlement be filed and proved as a public document in the suit against the tenant?

A

No, it cannot be because the original Memorandum of Family Settlement document which exists in the suit for partition which is disposed of, is a private document and not public document under Section 74 of the Evidence Act

B

Yes, if a certified copy is obtained of the Memorandum of Family Settlement, and filed in the suit against the tenant, as the certified copy being issued by a court, is a public document

C

Yes, certified copy obtained from a court of the Memorandum of Family Settlement will be a public document provided that the suit was filed and disposed of by a High Court and not the District Court

D

Yes provided the certified copy of the Memorandum of Family Settlement is sought to be proved by the executants of the memorandum of settlement

A tenant or licencee under section 116 of Evidence Act is estopped from denying the title of landlord

A

During the continuance of tenancy

B

After the creation of tenancy or licence

C

After the surrender of possession under tenancy or licence

D

All the above

Under Section 116 of the Indian Evidence Act, the tenant is stopped from denying the title of the landlord

A

During the continuance of the tenancy

B

Before creation of tenancy

C

After surrender of possession

D

All these

A tenant of an immovable property can deny title of the landlord to such immovable property:

Related Questions