Related Questions

A tenant or licencee under section 116 of Evidence Act is estopped from denying the title of landlord
Under Section 116 of the Evidence Act, the tenant is stopped from denying
The expression "holding over" under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 is used in the sense of retaining possession. A distinction is made between a tenant continuing in possession after the determination of the lease without the consent of the landlord, and a tenant doing so with the landlord's consent:
Under which section of Evidence Act, a tenant of immovable property is estopped from denying a title of the landlord to that property?
Which of the following statements are correct?
(1) A minor fraudulently misrepresenting his age is not stopped from denying the truth of his statement.
(2) A minor fraudulently misrepresenting his age is stopped from denying the truth of his statement.
(3) Estoppel does not operate to render a statute ineffective and so minor's agreement is always void.
Choose the correct answer from the given below:
In which of the following case, the Supreme Court held that "Once the period of lease expires, the relationship of landlord and tenant ceases, and the tenant becomes a trespasser and, therefore, there is no question of service of any notice under Section 106 Transfer of Property Act"?
Select the incorrect statements:
1. The Indian Evidence Act does not apply to arbitration proceedings.
2. The Indian Evidence Act does not apply to proceedings before a Commissioner appointed by the court for recording evidence
3. The Indian Evidence Act applies to affidavits presented to Courts
4. The Indian Evidence Act applies to judicial proceedings held before all kinds of military courts
Carefully read following statements:
1. According to Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, requirement is of two persons, whereas under Section 149 of Indian Penal Code, requirement is of five persons.
2. According to Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, common intention is required whereas under Section 149 Indian Penal Code, common object is required
3. Previous consent is required under Section 34 & 149 of Indian Penal Code
4. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and Section 149 of Indian Penal Code constitutes a specific offence
Which of the above statements is true:
Choice the correct propositions:
1. Evidence of fingerprint expert is substantive evidence.
2. Evidence of fingerprint expert can be used only to corroborate some items of substantive evidence which are otherwise on record.
3. Evidence of fingerprint expert is not substantive evidence.
4. Evidence of fingerprint expert is admissible in all circumstances as expert evidence.
Consider the following statements:
1. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code requires two persons whereas Section 149 of Indian Penal Code require five persons.
2. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code requires common intention, whereas Section 149 of Indian Penal Code requires common object
3. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and Section 149 of Indian Penal Code both require presence of a prior consent
4. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and section 149 of Indian Penal Code. Both create specific offence
Which of the above statements are correct?