The Supreme Court in 2017 read down Exception 2 to Section 375 Indian Penal Code to be meaningfully read as: "Sexual intercourse or sexual acts by a man with his own wife, the wife not being under eighteen years of age, is not rape," in the case of:

The Supreme Court in 2017 read down Exception 2 to Section 375 Indian Penal Code to be meaningfully read as: "Sexual intercourse or sexual acts by a man with his own wife, the wife not being under eighteen years of age, is not rape," in the case of: Correct Answer Independent Thought v. Union of India

Related Questions

Recently Supreme Court has interpreted the Exception 2 to S. 375 of Indian Penal Code as "Sexual intercourse or sexual acts by a man with his own wife, the wife not below 18 years, Is not rape". The case is-
The following sentences form a paragraph. The first and the last sentences of the paragraph are given. The rest of the sentences are numbered as P, Q, R and S. These four parts are not given in their proper order. Read the sentences and choose the alternative that arranges them in the correct order. 1. Sexual favouritism and gender partiality/discrimination are often similarly perceived. P. At the workplace, when romance involves sexual favouritism, it is important to comprehend the cause and extent of the presence of such favouritism i.e. whether this favouritism can give way to other employees (who are not directly involved in the illicit relationship) for claiming themselves as the victims of sexual harassment. Q. However, many critics have befittingly differentiated the two. R. This concludes that sexual favouritism and gender partiality bear both direct and indirect implications for employees.  S. They delineate that sexual favouritism entangles the discerning grant of a gain or opportunity at the workplace; in contrast, sexual partiality/discrimination usually involves the restraining of benefits or opportunities dependent upon an individual's gender. 6. Whether favouritism on the basis of sex remains a legitimate shape of discrimination, or whether sexual favouritism stretches to the extent of a restricted form of sexual partiality, is an important question which can only be answered through comprehending the definition of sexual harassment.