Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Recently Supreme Court has interpreted the Exception 2 to S. 375 of Indian Penal Code as "Sexual intercourse or sexual acts by a man with his own wife, the wife not below 18 years, Is not rape". The case is-

Recently Supreme Court has interpreted the Exception 2 to S. 375 of Indian Penal Code as "Sexual intercourse or sexual acts by a man with his own wife, the wife not below 18 years, Is not rape". The case is- Correct Answer Independent Thought v. Union of India

Related Questions

The Supreme Court in 2017 read down Exception 2 to Section 375 Indian Penal Code to be meaningfully read as: "Sexual intercourse or sexual acts by a man with his own wife, the wife not being under eighteen years of age, is not rape," in the case of:
Consider the following statements:
1. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code requires two persons whereas Section 149 of Indian Penal Code require five persons.
2. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code requires common intention, whereas Section 149 of Indian Penal Code requires common object
3. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and Section 149 of Indian Penal Code both require presence of a prior consent
4. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and section 149 of Indian Penal Code. Both create specific offence
Which of the above statements are correct?
The Supreme Court has held that "sexual intercourse or sexual acts by a man with his own wife, the wife not being . . . . . . . . years, is not rape."
Carefully read following statements:
1. According to Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, requirement is of two persons, whereas under Section 149 of Indian Penal Code, requirement is of five persons.
2. According to Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, common intention is required whereas under Section 149 Indian Penal Code, common object is required
3. Previous consent is required under Section 34 & 149 of Indian Penal Code
4. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and Section 149 of Indian Penal Code constitutes a specific offence
Which of the above statements is true:
The following sentences form a paragraph. The first and the last sentences of the paragraph are given. The rest of the sentences are numbered as P, Q, R and S. These four parts are not given in their proper order. Read the sentences and choose the alternative that arranges them in the correct order. 1. Sexual favouritism and gender partiality/discrimination are often similarly perceived. P. At the workplace, when romance involves sexual favouritism, it is important to comprehend the cause and extent of the presence of such favouritism i.e. whether this favouritism can give way to other employees (who are not directly involved in the illicit relationship) for claiming themselves as the victims of sexual harassment. Q. However, many critics have befittingly differentiated the two. R. This concludes that sexual favouritism and gender partiality bear both direct and indirect implications for employees.  S. They delineate that sexual favouritism entangles the discerning grant of a gain or opportunity at the workplace; in contrast, sexual partiality/discrimination usually involves the restraining of benefits or opportunities dependent upon an individual's gender. 6. Whether favouritism on the basis of sex remains a legitimate shape of discrimination, or whether sexual favouritism stretches to the extent of a restricted form of sexual partiality, is an important question which can only be answered through comprehending the definition of sexual harassment.
Which of the following combinations are correctly matched?
1. Harbour ⇔ Section 51A, Indian Penal Code
2. Wrongful Loss ⇔ Section 23, Indian Penal Code
3. Gang rape on woman under twelve years of age ⇔ Section 376DB, Indian Penal Code
4. Gang rape ⇔ Section 376D, Indian Penal Code
Select the correct answer:
A (a 28 year old man) and B (a 27 year old woman) were in a romantic relationship and were living together. After being in a relationship for nearly three years, A asked B whether they could have sexual intercourse. B said that she would consent to sexual intercourse only if A agreed to marry her. A promised to marry B, and thereafter they had sexual intercourse multiple times over the next three years. Subsequently, B discovered that A was not being faithful to her and was in a relationship with another woman. She broke off the relationship, and sought to initiate criminal proceedings against A. Which of the following offences can A be prosecuted for?
A five-judge bench of the Supreme Court passes judgment in a matter. In a later case before a high court, a party presents the Supreme Court judgment as a binding authority. The opposing party claims that the high court is not bound by the Supreme Court's judgment because relevant provisions of law were not brought to the notice of the Supreme Court in that case. Which of the following is most correct in this case?
Principle: Article 141 of the Constitution provides that the law declared by the Supreme Court is binding on all courts within the territory of India.
The five addresses are given below. Which two addresses are exactly the same? 1. Mr. K. Raghuramiaya, K-379, Guntakalpkam, Fortbridge Street, Telampuram - 375 612 2.Mr. K. Raghuramaiya, K-379, Guntakalpkam, Fortbridge Street, Telampuram - 375 612 3.Mr. K. Raghuramiaya, K-379, Guntaklapkam, Fortbridge Street, Talempuram - 375 612 4.Mr. K. Raghuramaiya, K-379, Guntakalpkam, Fortbridge Street, Telampuram - 375 612 5. Mr. K. Raghuramaiya, K-379, Guntakalpakam, Fortbridge Street, Talempuram - 375 612
Under the provisions of section 198(6) where an offence under section 676 of Indian Penal Code consists of sexual intercourse by a man with his own wife, the wife being under . . . . . . . . years of age, no court shall take cognizance of the offence if more than one year has elapsed from the date of the commission of the offence