According to which section of IPC, a person is said to defame the other by words either spoken or intended to be read or by signs or visible representations or by making or publishing any imputation concerning any person intending to harm?

Identify the situations where slander is actionable per se under the English law of Tort:
1. Imputation of criminal offence to the plaintiff
2. Imputation of belonging to the lower caste
3. Imputation of a contagious or infectious disease
4. Imputation of unchastity or adultery to any woman
Select the correct answer using the given below:

A

2, 3 and 4

B

1, 3 and 4

C

1 and 4

D

1 and 3

Given below are two statements, followed by three conclusions, I, II and III. You have to consider the statement to be true even if they to be at variance from commonly known fats. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, support(s) the given statements. Statements 1: All the books written by X are textbooks. Statement 2: Some of his books are published by ABC Publishing Company. Conclusion 1: ABC Publishing Company publishes textbooks only. Conclusion II: Some textbook written by X are published by publishers other than ABC Publishing Company. Conclusion III: ABC Publishing Company publishes some critical theories written by X.

A

Only conclusion I follows

B

Only conclusion II follows

C

Only conclusion III follows

D

None of the 3 conclusions follow

A is accused of defaming B by publishing an imputation intended to harm the reputation of B. The fact of previous publication by A representing B, showing ill will on A's part towards 'B' is relevant, because

A

It proves the preparation of harming A's reputation

B

It is necessary to explain fact in issue

C

It proves intention to harm B's reputation

D

It explains the previous conduct of A

PRINCIPLES: 1. Nothing is an offence which is done in the exercise of the right of private defense.
2. When an act, which would otherwise be a certain offence, is not that offence, by reason of the youth, the want of maturity of understanding, the unsoundness of mind or the intoxication of that person or by reason of misconception on the part of that person, every person has the same right of private defense against that act, which he would have if that act were an offence.
3. Everyone has the right to defend their life and property against criminal harm provided it is not possible to approach public authorities and more harm than that is necessary has not been caused to avert the danger.
4. If in the exercise of right of private defense against an assault which reasonably causes the apprehension of death, the defender be so situated that he cannot effectually exercise that right without risk of harm to an innocent person, his right of private defense extends to the running of that risk.
5. The right of private defense continues as long as apprehension of danger continues.
FACT: A enters by night a house which he is legally entitled to enter. Z, in good faith, taking A for a housebreaker, attacks A.

A

A has no right of private defense because it is available against an offender only

B

A has the same right of private defense against Z, which he would have had if Z was not acting under a misconception

C

A has exceeded his right of private defense

D

None of the above

In the following passage, some of the words have been left out. Read the passage carefully and select the correct answer for the given blank out of thefour alternatives. Violence takes a heavy toll and affects public life ______. High or low, known or unknown, rich or poor, popular or unpopular, no one is safe or secure today. It
appears that one can harm anybody at any time and at ______. A mad and sad rat race is on to make money and ______ power at any cost and by any means. The
result is that no political party or group can now ______ into claim to total innocence in so far as ______ of violence against innocent person for personal or political
gains is concerned. Violent demonstrations, rallies, hartals have become the order of the day. It appears that one can harm anybody at any time and at ______.

A

wish

B

will

C

drill

D

still

A group of 74 students of Class XI went on picnic. The number of students who went on picnic by each section is as follows: Section A = 15 Section B = 24 Section C = 15 Section D = 20 5 students from Section A spent as much as 4 students from Section B. 12 Section B students spent as much as 9 Section C students and 6 Section C students spent as much as 8 Section D student. If every student of a particular section spent the same amount and all the students spent Rs. 23,370 altogether, find the amount spent by each student of Section D?

A

Rs. 307.50

B

Rs. 410

C

Rs. 246.50

D

Rs. 369

In the context of language spoken in Jharkhand, consider the following statement is/are correct?
1. Kurmali is mainly spoken in Hazaribagh and Ranchi.
2. Munda language is chiefly spoken in Chota Nagpur plateau.
3. Kurukh language mainly spoken by Oraon tribe of the state.
Which of the statement(s) given above is/are correct?

A

Only 1

B

1 and 2

C

2 and 3

D

All of these

A

i only

B

ii only

C

Both i and ii

D

Neither i nor ii

To constitute a matter of res judicata which of the following conditions must concur?
1. The matter directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit or issue must be the same matter which was directly and substantially in issue either actually (section 11, explanation III) or constructively (section 11, explanation IV) in the former suit
2. The former suit must have been a suit between the same parties under whom they or any of them claim. Explanation VI of Section 11 must be read with this condition
3. The parties as aforesaid must have litigated under the same title in the former suit
4. The court which decided the former suit must have been a court competent to try the subsequent suit of the suit in which such issue has been subsequently raised. Explanation II of section 11 is to be read with condition
5. The matter directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit must have been heard and finally decided by the court in the first suit. Explanation V of section 11 is to be read with this condition

A

1, 2

B

3, 4

C

2, 4, 5

D

All of these

Sedition has been defined as bringing or attempt to bring hatred or contempt, or exciting or attempt to excite disaffection towards the Government established by law in India, by words, either spoken or written, or by signs or visible representation or otherwise, under

A

Section 120 of Indian Penal Code

B

Section 120A of Indian Penal Code

C

Section 121A of Indian Penal Code

D

Section 124A of Indian Penal Code

According to which section of IPC, a person is said to defame the other by words either spoken or intended to be read or by signs or visible representations or by making or publishing any imputation concerning any person intending to harm?

Related Questions