Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

A is accused of defaming B by publishing an imputation intended to harm the reputation of B. The fact of previous publication by A representing B, showing ill will on A's part towards 'B' is relevant, because

A is accused of defaming B by publishing an imputation intended to harm the reputation of B. The fact of previous publication by A representing B, showing ill will on A's part towards 'B' is relevant, because Correct Answer It explains the previous conduct of A

Related Questions

Identify the situations where slander is actionable per se under the English law of Tort:
1. Imputation of criminal offence to the plaintiff
2. Imputation of belonging to the lower caste
3. Imputation of a contagious or infectious disease
4. Imputation of unchastity or adultery to any woman
Select the correct answer using the given below:
Under the Evidence Act facts not otherwise relevant are relevant . . . . . . . .
1. If they are significant
2. If they are inconsistent with any fact in issue or relevant fact
3. If they make the existence or nonexistence of any fact in issue or relevant fact highly probable or improbable
Choose correct answer:
The logic problems in this set present you with three true statements: Fact 1, Fact 2 and Fact 3. Then you are given three more statements (labelled I, II, III), and you must determine which of these, if any, is also a fact. One or two of the statements could be true; or none of the statements could be true. Fact 1: Pictures can tell a story. Fact 2: All storybooks have pictures. Fact 3: Some storybooks have both words and pictures. If the first three statements are facts, which of the following statement/(s) must also be a fact? I. Pictures can tell a story better than words can. II. The stories in storybooks are very simple. III. Some storybooks have both words and pictures. Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
The logic problems in this set present you with three true statements: Fact 1, Fact 2 and Fact 3. Then you are given three more statements (labelled I, II, III), and you must determine which of these, if any, is also a fact. One or two of the statements could be true; or none of the statements could be true. Fact 1: Most stuffed toys are stuffed with beans. Fact 2: There are stuffed bears and stuffed tigers. Fact 3: Some chairs are stuffed with beans. If the fist three statements are facts, which of the following statement/(s) must also be a fact? I. Only children's chairs are stuffed with beans. II. All stuffed tigers are stuffed with beans. III. Stuffed monkeys are not stuffed with beans. Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
The logic problems in this set present you with three true statements: Fact 1, Fact 2 and Fact 3. Then you are given three more statements (labelled I, II, III), and you must determine which of these, if any, is also a fact. One or two of the statements could be true; or none of the statements could be true. Fact 1: All chickens are birds. Fact 2: Some chickens are hens. Fact 3: Female birds lay eggs. If the first three statements are facts, which of the following statement/(s) must also be a fact? I. All birds lay eggs. II. Hens are birds. III. Some chickens are not hens. Choose the correct answer from the options given below: 
The logic problems in this set present you with three true statements: Fact 1, Fact 2 and Fact 3. Then you are given three more statements (labelled I, II, III), and you must determine which of these, if any, is also a fact. One or two of the statements could be true; or none of the statements could be true. Fact 1: All hats have brims. Fact 2: There are black hats and blue hats. Fact 3: Baseball caps are hats. If the first three statements are facts, which of the following statement/(s) must also be a fact? I. All caps have brims. II. Some baseball caps are blue. III. Baseball caps have no brims. Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
The logic problems in this set present you with three true statements: Fact 1, Fact 2 and Fact 3. Then you are given three more statements (labelled I, II, III), and you must determine which of these, if any, is also a fact. One or two of the statements could be true; or none of the statements could be true. Fact 1: Jessica has four children. Fact 2: Two of the children have blue eyes and two of the children have brown eyes. Fact 3: Half of the children are girls. If the fist three statements are facts, which of the following statement/(s) must also be a fact? I. At least one girl has blue eyes. II. Two of the children are boys. III. The boys have brown eyes. Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
According to which section of IPC, a person is said to defame the other by words either spoken or intended to be read or by signs or visible representations or by making or publishing any imputation concerning any person intending to harm?
Given below are two statements, followed by three conclusions, I, II and III. You have to consider the statement to be true even if they to be at variance from commonly known fats. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, support(s) the given statements. Statements 1: All the books written by X are textbooks. Statement 2: Some of his books are published by ABC Publishing Company. Conclusion 1: ABC Publishing Company publishes textbooks only. Conclusion II: Some textbook written by X are published by publishers other than ABC Publishing Company. Conclusion III: ABC Publishing Company publishes some critical theories written by X.
Consider the following statements:
1. In criminal proceedings good character of the accused is always relevant
2. In criminal proceedings bad character of the accused is always relevant
3. In a civil case evidence of character of any person concerned is always admissible
4. A previous conviction is relevant as evidence of bad character
Which of the statements given above are correct?