Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

What is meant by integer partition?

What is meant by integer partition? Correct Answer representing an integer as sum of positive integers

Integer partition is the way of representing an integer as sum of positive integers. Partitions differing only in their order are considered to be same.

Related Questions

Propositions are
1. A son is liable, before partition, for the debts contracted by his father before partition which are not immoral or illegal.
2. A son is liable, after partition, for the debts contracted by his father before partition which are not immoral or illegal.
3. A son is liable, after partition, for the debts contracted by his father after partition which are not immoral or illegal which of the following is true in respect of the aforesaid propositions.
A particular BNF definition for a “word” is given by the following rules. ∷ = | | ∷ = |  ∷ = |  ∷ = a | b | c | ….. |y| z  ∷ = 0 |1|2| …… | 9 Which of the following lexical entries can be derived from < word > ? l. pick II. picks lll. c44
In a suit for partition of property and for separate possession of a share therein, the civil court having declared the rights of several parties interested in the property:
1. Which is assessed to payment of revenue to the Government, must make over the matter for such partition or separation to be made by the Collector.
2. Which is not so assessed to payment of revenue to the Government, must examine if the partition or separation can be conveniently made and for this, may issue a Commission to make the partition or separation.
3. If on examination of the report of the Commissioner, the Court finds that the property cannot be divided by metes and bounds, it may put it to sale and divide the proceeds thereof.
In the above:
The sum o three integers is 40. The largest integer is 3 times the middle integer, and the smallest integer is 23 less than the largest integer. what is the product of the three integers?
Suppliers(Sid: integer, sname:string, city:string, street:string) Parts(pid:integer, pname:string, color:string) Catalog(sid:integer, pid:integer, cost:real) Consider the following relational query on the above database: SELECT S.sname FROM Suppliers S  WHERE S.sid NOT IN (SELECT C.sid FROM Catalog C WHERE C.pid NOT IN (SELECT P.pid FROM Parts P WHERE P.color < > ‘blue’)) Assume that relations corresponding to the above schema are not empty. Which of the following is the correct interpretation of the above query?
Consider the following relational schema. Students(rollno: integer, sname: string) Courses(courseno: integer, cname: string) Registration(rollno: integer, courseno: integer, percent: real) Which of the following queries are equivalent to this query in English? “Find the distinct names of all students who score more than 90% in the course numbered 107” (I) SELECT DISTINCT S.sname FROM Students as S, Registration as R WHERE R.rollno=S.rollno AND R.courseno=107 AND R.percent >90 (II) Πsname (σcourseno = 107∧percent>90 (Registration ⋈ Students)) (III) {T | ∃S ∈ Students, ∃R ∈ Registration (S.rollno = R.rollno ∧R. courseno = 107 ∧ R.percent > 90 ∧ T.sname = S. sname)} (IV) {〈SN〉 | ∃SR∃RP(〈SR, SN〉 ∈ Students ∧ 〈SR, 107, RP〉 ∈ Registration ∧ RP > 90)}
When a certain positive integer P is divided by another positive integer, the remainder is $${r_{1}}$$ . When a second positive integer Q is divided by the same integer, the remainder is $${r_{2}}$$ and when (P + Q) is divided by the same divisor, the remainder is $${r_{3}}$$ . Then the divisor may be :
Which of the following statement is/are correct? The partition of Bengal was a historic decision taken by the British from the point of view of administrative convenience. Bengal partition was done to increase Muslim communalism "Partition of Bengal" was responsible for swadeshi, and the boycott movement. Select the correct code from below.
In a suit for partition, a Memorandum of Family Settlement is filed and on this basis the partition suit is decreed, but even after disposal of the suit the original Memorandum of Family Settlement remains in the file of the partition suit, then in such situation whether in a suit for eviction by one of the original co-owner of a tenant of a shop of the joint property which has fallen to the share of that co-owner as per the decree passed on the Memorandum of Family Settlement, can the certified copy of the Memorandum of Family Settlement be filed and proved as a public document in the suit against the tenant?
Where the decree is for the partition of an undivided estate assessed to the payment of revenue to the government, the partition of revenue to the government, the partition of the estate, in accordance with the law for the time being in force, shall be made by