Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

In a suit for partition of property and for separate possession of a share therein, the civil court having declared the rights of several parties interested in the property:
1. Which is assessed to payment of revenue to the Government, must make over the matter for such partition or separation to be made by the Collector.
2. Which is not so assessed to payment of revenue to the Government, must examine if the partition or separation can be conveniently made and for this, may issue a Commission to make the partition or separation.
3. If on examination of the report of the Commissioner, the Court finds that the property cannot be divided by metes and bounds, it may put it to sale and divide the proceeds thereof.
In the above:

In a suit for partition of property and for separate possession of a share therein, the civil court having declared the rights of several parties interested in the property:
1. Which is assessed to payment of revenue to the Government, must make over the matter for such partition or separation to be made by the Collector.
2. Which is not so assessed to payment of revenue to the Government, must examine if the partition or separation can be conveniently made and for this, may issue a Commission to make the partition or separation.
3. If on examination of the report of the Commissioner, the Court finds that the property cannot be divided by metes and bounds, it may put it to sale and divide the proceeds thereof.
In the above: Correct Answer 1, 2 and 3 are correct

Related Questions

To constitute a matter of res judicata which of the following conditions must concur?
1. The matter directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit or issue must be the same matter which was directly and substantially in issue either actually (section 11, explanation III) or constructively (section 11, explanation IV) in the former suit
2. The former suit must have been a suit between the same parties under whom they or any of them claim. Explanation VI of Section 11 must be read with this condition
3. The parties as aforesaid must have litigated under the same title in the former suit
4. The court which decided the former suit must have been a court competent to try the subsequent suit of the suit in which such issue has been subsequently raised. Explanation II of section 11 is to be read with condition
5. The matter directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit must have been heard and finally decided by the court in the first suit. Explanation V of section 11 is to be read with this condition
Which of the following distinction(s) is/are not correct between public issue and rights issue? (A) In public issue, applications for shares are invited from the general public and in rights issue, the shares are offered to existing shareholders. (B) In public issue there is no question of any over-subscription and in rights issue the shares may be under subscribed or over subscribed leading to prorata allotment. (C) The price of public issue is generally less than the market price and in rights issue, the price is deliberately made less than the market price. (D) In a public issue, the communication of the issue is through prospectus or advertisements and in a rights issue the communication is between the company and the existing members of the company. Choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below:
Which of the following statements are correct in the context of Section 5 of Code of Civil Procedure?
1. Revenue Court is a part of Civil Court
2. Civil Court. means courts having original jurisdiction under Code of Civil Procedure but not Revenue Court
3. Civil Court means courts having original jurisdiction under Code of Civil Procedure including Revenue Court
4. Revenue Court is not a part of Civil Court
A', on 9th January, 2015 agrees to sell his immovable property to 'R' and out of the total sale consideration of Rs. 3,00,000/- receives a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- from 'B' as advance payment and agrees to vacate the property and handover vacant peaceful physical possession thereof to 'B' and to execute the Sale Deed of the property in favour of 'B' on receipt of balance sale 'consideration' on or before 9th July, 2015. 'A' fails to vacate the property or to execute the Sale Deed or to deliver possession of the property to 'B'. 'B' after waiting patiently till 31st January, 2016, on 1st February, 2016 got issued a legal notice to 'A' to take the balance sale consideration and execute the Sale Deed and deliver vacant peaceful physical possession. 'A' vide his reply received by 'B' on 17th February, 2016 denies the agreement. The limitation of three years available to 'B' for instituting a suit for specific performance is:
Choose the correct answer
(1) A trustee may also be a beneficiary and can be the sole beneficiary
(2) A trustee may also be a beneficiary, but cannot be the sole beneficiary
(3) A donor may also constitute himself a trustee, and though remaining in possession, may transfer legal possession by declaring his possession as donee's.
(4) A donor may also constitute himself a trustee, and though remaining in possession, cannot transfer legal possession by declaring his possession as donee's.
In a suit for partition, a Memorandum of Family Settlement is filed and on this basis the partition suit is decreed, but even after disposal of the suit the original Memorandum of Family Settlement remains in the file of the partition suit, then in such situation whether in a suit for eviction by one of the original co-owner of a tenant of a shop of the joint property which has fallen to the share of that co-owner as per the decree passed on the Memorandum of Family Settlement, can the certified copy of the Memorandum of Family Settlement be filed and proved as a public document in the suit against the tenant?
The conditions regarding selection from a list of suitable candidates to be called for interview after a written examination for appointment of management-level persons to a multi-national company providing accounting services and sales are mentioned below. Candidates: a) Must have a Bachelor's degree in Basic Science with 65% or more marks or BE with 55% or more marks. b) Must have passed the examination with 70% or more marks. c) Age must be between 25 to 30 years as of 1/4/18. d) Must have 3 years of experience in an Accounting Institution and must have a Diploma in Accounting with 60% or more marks. e) Must be currently getting CTC of Rs. 6 lakh or more per annum. If the candidate: 1) If he fulfills all the other conditions other than A above, he will be designated as Junior Accountant. 2) If he fulfills all the other conditions other than (d) and (e) above, he can be designated as Trainee-Accountant. If he fulfills all the above conditions including 5 years of experience, he can be designated as a Senior Accountant. He can be designated as Manager (Accounts) if he fulfills all the above criteria including educational qualifications of CA/ ICWA/ MBA (Finance). Study all the above information and answer the following question. Varun has passed the CA exam and has a bachelor's degree in basic science and a diploma in accountancy, having scored 75% or more in the written examination during his entire career and also in the written examination. His age is 27 years and with 4 years of experience in Accountancy, he has a CTC salary of 18 lakhs per annum. To which of the following positions can he be referred? Select from the given options.
Who among the following can be appointed as the authority to hear and decide any claims arising out of deductions form wages or delay in payment of wages under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936?
1. Any Commissioner for Employees Compensation Act
2. Any regional labour commissioner appointed by the Central Government
3. Any assistant labour commissioner appointed by the Central Government
4. Any assistant labour commissioner appointed by the State Government with atleast two years of experinece.
5. A Judge of a Civil Court.
Seven people A, B, C, D, E, F and G live on separate floors of a 7-floor building. Ground floor is numbered 1, first floor is numbered. 2 and so on until the topmost floor is numbered 7. Each one of these having a different cars-Cadillac, Ambassador, Fiat, Maruti, Mercedes, Bedford and Fargo but not necessarily in the same order. Only three people live above the floor on which A lives. Only one person lives between A and the one having a car Cadillac. F lives immediately below the one having a car Bedford. The one having a car Bedford lives on an even-numbered floor. Only three people live between the ones having a car Cadillac and Maruti. E lives immediately above C. E is not having a car Maruti. Only two people live between B and the one having a car Fargo. The one having a car Fargo lives below the floor on which B lives. The one having a car Fiat does not live immediately above D or immediately below B. D does not live immediately above or immediately below A. G does not have a car Ambassador. Question : How many people live between the floors on which D and the one having a car Bedford ?
In a contractual dispute between two parties A and B, A files a suit in New Delhi where the cause of action arose. Two days later, B files a suit in the same matter in Mumbai, where A is resident. The pendency of the first suit is not brought to the notice of the court in Mumbai. The court pronounces judgement in second suit before the first suit is decided. Would such decision operate as a bar on the court in New Delhi to try the suit any further?