Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

A', on 9th January, 2015 agrees to sell his immovable property to 'R' and out of the total sale consideration of Rs. 3,00,000/- receives a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- from 'B' as advance payment and agrees to vacate the property and handover vacant peaceful physical possession thereof to 'B' and to execute the Sale Deed of the property in favour of 'B' on receipt of balance sale 'consideration' on or before 9th July, 2015. 'A' fails to vacate the property or to execute the Sale Deed or to deliver possession of the property to 'B'. 'B' after waiting patiently till 31st January, 2016, on 1st February, 2016 got issued a legal notice to 'A' to take the balance sale consideration and execute the Sale Deed and deliver vacant peaceful physical possession. 'A' vide his reply received by 'B' on 17th February, 2016 denies the agreement. The limitation of three years available to 'B' for instituting a suit for specific performance is:

A', on 9th January, 2015 agrees to sell his immovable property to 'R' and out of the total sale consideration of Rs. 3,00,000/- receives a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- from 'B' as advance payment and agrees to vacate the property and handover vacant peaceful physical possession thereof to 'B' and to execute the Sale Deed of the property in favour of 'B' on receipt of balance sale 'consideration' on or before 9th July, 2015. 'A' fails to vacate the property or to execute the Sale Deed or to deliver possession of the property to 'B'. 'B' after waiting patiently till 31st January, 2016, on 1st February, 2016 got issued a legal notice to 'A' to take the balance sale consideration and execute the Sale Deed and deliver vacant peaceful physical possession. 'A' vide his reply received by 'B' on 17th February, 2016 denies the agreement. The limitation of three years available to 'B' for instituting a suit for specific performance is: Correct Answer With effect from 9<sup>th</sup> July, 2015

Related Questions

X' executed a sale deed in favour of 'Y' on 1st January, 2002. Subsequently on 10th January, 2002, 'X' executed a sale deed in respect of the same property in favour of 'Z'. Thereafter the sale deed in favour of 'Z' executed on 10th January, 2002 was registered on 20th January, 2002. Whereas the sale deed in favour of 'Y' was registered on 30th January, 2002.
In the said case, by virtue of section 47
A' and 'B' orally agree to sell an estate. 'A' dishonestly induces 'B' to make advance payment of Rs. 5 lacs and make final payment at the execution of conveyance 'B' pays advance amount. Later on, at the request of 'B' to execute the conveyance, 'A' denies the- agreement as well as the receipt of any amount. What offence has been committed by 'A'?
X' a Muslim executes a deed of gift on 1st January, 2002 of his property to 'Y', but delivery of possession is not given. Later, on 10th January, 2002 executed another gift deed in favour of 'Z' which was accompanied by delivery of possession to 'Z'. The gift deeds in favour of 'Y' & 'Z' were registered on 30th January, 2002 & 20th January, 2002 respectively.
In these facts,
Each question presents a situation and asks you to make a judgement regarding that particular circumstance. Choose an answer based on given information. Three friends are waiting for a train on the railway station. Suddenly, a train passes by and each of them tries to remember the train number of the train written on each of the coaches. The train number was a 5-digit number. All must agree in order to confirm the digit of train number. 1. All three agrees that all the digits of the train number was different. 2. All three agrees that the difference of 3rd and 5th digit from left is equal to the 4th digit from the left. 3. All three agrees that the 1st digit was 1. 4. All three agrees that the 2nd digit was an even prime number. Which of the following would be most likely the train number?
To constitute a matter of res judicata which of the following conditions must concur?
1. The matter directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit or issue must be the same matter which was directly and substantially in issue either actually (section 11, explanation III) or constructively (section 11, explanation IV) in the former suit
2. The former suit must have been a suit between the same parties under whom they or any of them claim. Explanation VI of Section 11 must be read with this condition
3. The parties as aforesaid must have litigated under the same title in the former suit
4. The court which decided the former suit must have been a court competent to try the subsequent suit of the suit in which such issue has been subsequently raised. Explanation II of section 11 is to be read with condition
5. The matter directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit must have been heard and finally decided by the court in the first suit. Explanation V of section 11 is to be read with this condition
B' a bank, under a scheme for grant of educational loan to females, grants a loan of Rs. 2,00,000/- to 'A'. 'A' fails to repay the loan and 'B' files a suit for recovery thereof. During the pendency of suit, 'A' is married. 'B' does not take any steps within the prescribed time, to substitute the maiden name of 'A' with the married name of 'A' in the suit. The suit is decided in favour of 'B' and against 'A' in her maiden name:
A, writes a letter to B offering to sell his car at Rs. 2 lac and states that if he does not receive a reply within 15 days of the receipt of the letter by B, the offer shall be deemed to have been accepted. B does not send a reply even after 15 days of the receipt of the letter by B. Has the offer been validly accepted?
A' entered into an agreement with 'B' to sell immovable property of the former for consideration and 'B' was put in possession of the property. Both parties had signed the agreement. The agreement had not been registered under the Indian Registration Act. In a suit between the parties, 'B' claimed the benefit of Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act. Whether his claim is maintainable?
S1: A man handed a pair of trousers to the departmental store-clerk and said,"I'd like these altered, please".
P: He said that free alteration is not possible without a receipt.
Q: The man said,"Okay, I'd like to return the trousers". The clerk took them back and returned his money.
R: The man pushed the money and said,"Now I want to buy them". The clerk put the trousers in a bag, issued receipt and handed him both.
S: The clerk asked for the sales receipt but after searching his pockets the man replied that he had lost it.
S6: Triumphantly he put the trousers and the receipt on the counter and said,'I'd like to have these altered, please."

The Proper sequence should be:
In a suit for specific performance of an Agreement of Sale of immovable property the defendant along with his written statement files an application under Section 8 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act for referring the parties to arbitration in accordance with arbitration clause contained in the Agreement to Sell. The plaintiff admits the existence of the arbitration clause as well as that the subject matter of suit is subject matter of such arbitration clause. The Court shall: