Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Consider the given statements to be true and decide which of the given conclusion/assumptions can definitely be drawn from the given statement Statements: All good athletes win. All good athletes eat well. Conclusions: I. All those who eat well are good athletes. II. All those who win eat well.

Consider the given statements to be true and decide which of the given conclusion/assumptions can definitely be drawn from the given statement Statements: All good athletes win. All good athletes eat well. Conclusions: I. All those who eat well are good athletes. II. All those who win eat well. Correct Answer if neither conclusion I nor II follows

The least possible Venn diagram is:

[ alt="F2 Sweta Ravi 30.08.21 D8" src="//storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/21/08/F2_Sweta_Ravi_30.08.21_D8.png" style="width: 269px; height: 103px;">

Conclusions:

I. All those who eat well are good athletes →  False (it is possible but not definite as shown in the figure that some who eat well can not be good athletes)

II. All those who win eat well → False (it is possible but not definite as shown in the figure that some who win may not eat well)

Hence, neither conclusion I nor II follows​. 

Related Questions

Statements : All good athletes win. All good athletes eat well. Conclusions : I. All those who eat well are good athletes. II. All those who win eat well.
Statements : All good athletes win. All good athletes eat well.

Conclusions :
I. All those who eat well are good athletes.
II. All those who win eat well.
All good athletes wants to win, and all athletes who want to win eat a well balanced diet : therefore, all athletes who do not eat a well balanced diet are bad athletes. Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the assumptions of the argument above?
All good athletes want to win and all athletes who want to win eat a well-balanced diet; therefore all athletes who do not eat a well-balanced diet are bad athletes. The best conclusion from this statement is that
In the question three statements are given, followed by three conclusions, I, II and III. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement I: Some injuries are serious. Statement II: No relation is serious. Statement III: All athletes have injuries. Conclusion I: Some athletes are serious. Conclusion II: Some athletes have relation is a possibility. Conclusion III: No athletes is serious.
You are given two statements and two conclusions. Choose the correct option regarding the conclusion from the options given below. Statement: All good players win. All good players eat well. Conclusion: I. All those who eat well are good players. II. All who win eat well.
Two statements are given followed by two conclusions as responses. You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusion(s) can definitely be drawn from the given statements. Statements: There was a time when the world believed that women cannot be as good as men due to the gender stereotypes that existed in the society. Marie Curie turned out to be an excellent scientist and was the first person to win the Nobel Prize twice. Conclusions: Marie Curie broke the gender stereotypes by turning out to be better than men. Marie Curie wanted to win the Nobel Prize.
Two statements are given, followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follows(s) from the statements. Statements : a. Some men are players. b. All players are athletes. Conclusions : i. No athlete is a man. ii. All men are athletes. iii. Some athletes are men.
Two statements are given, followed by three conclusions numbered I, I and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: Some males are swimmers. All swimmers are athletes. Conclusions: I. Some athletes are males. II. No athlete is male. I. Some athletes are swimmers.
In the following question, one or two statement(s) is/are given followed by two conclusions/assumptions, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true, even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given conclusions/assumptions can definitely be drawn from the givenstatement. Indicate your answer. Statement: Some kings are queens. All queens are beautiful . Conclusions:I­ All kings are beautiful. Conclusions:II­ All queens are kings