Statements : All good athletes win. All good athletes eat well.

Conclusions :
I. All those who eat well are good athletes.
II. All those who win eat well.

Statements : All good athletes win. All good athletes eat well.

Conclusions :
I. All those who eat well are good athletes.
II. All those who win eat well. Correct Answer Neither I nor II follows

Since the middle term 'good athletes' is distributed twice in the premises, the conclusion must be particular and should not contain the middle term. So it follows that 'Some of those who win, eat well'.

Related Questions

Statements : All good athletes win. All good athletes eat well. Conclusions : I. All those who eat well are good athletes. II. All those who win eat well.
All good athletes wants to win, and all athletes who want to win eat a well balanced diet : therefore, all athletes who do not eat a well balanced diet are bad athletes. Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the assumptions of the argument above?
All good athletes want to win and all athletes who want to win eat a well-balanced diet; therefore all athletes who do not eat a well-balanced diet are bad athletes. The best conclusion from this statement is that