For the conjugate beam method to be applicable, which of the following rules is not followed 

For the conjugate beam method to be applicable, which of the following rules is not followed  Correct Answer The maximum indeterminacy can be upto 5 degree

Explanation:

Properties of conjugate beam method:

  • The length of a conjugate beam is always equal to the length of the actual beam.
  • The load on the conjugate beam is the M/EI diagram of the loads on the actual beam.
  • A simple support for the real beam remains simple support for the conjugate beam.
  • A fixed end for the real beam becomes free end for the conjugate beam.
  • The point of zero shear force for the conjugate beam corresponds to a point of zero slope for the real beam.
  • The point of maximum moment for the conjugate beam corresponds to a point of maximum deflection for the real beam.
  • The conjugate beam must be satisfied static equilibrium condition.
  • No other loading should be applied to the conjugate beam other than the elastic weight.
  • The original beam (Real beam) must be statically determinate.

Related Questions

In the question below, are given a statement followed by three courses of actions numbered I, II and III. On the basis of the information given, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the following suggested courses of actions logically follow(s) for pursuing. Statement: Soon VAT 69 whiskey and Smirnoff Vodka will not be found on the shelves of Delhi Liquor stores owing to the duplication of barcode by manufacturer United Limited. The Delhi government financial commissioner blacklisted the manufacturer. Financial commissioner Anindo Majumdar had said in an order dated September 14, that USL had violated provisions of the Delhi Excise Act, 2009 and Delhi Excise Rules, 2010 by using unauthorized and loose barcodes, which could be easily misused. Courses of action: I. The ban will force United Spirits Limited not to sell its liquor in the national capital for two years. II. the appellant violated provisions of the Delhi Excise Act, 2009, Delhi Excise Rules, 2010, the terms and conditions of the license issued to it and the standard operating procedure framed by the Delhi Excise Department and that consequently the department has rightly imposed the penalty of blacklisting under Rule 70 of the Delhi Excise Rules, 2010 upon United Spirits LTD (USL), Aurangabad. III. United Limited has been blacklisted by the Delhi government financial commissioner.