Which of the following is not an appropriate strategy used to promote qualitative research validation?

Which of the following is not an appropriate strategy used to promote qualitative research validation? Correct Answer Random validation of assignments

Correct Answer: Random validation of assignments.

Key Points

  • Robson (2002) suggested a number of strategies aimed at addressing these threats to validity, namely prolonged involvement, triangulation, peer debriefing, member checking, negative case analysis, and keeping an audit trail.
  • Peer review is the evaluation of work by one or more people with similar competencies as the producers of the work.
  • It functions as a form of self-regulation by qualified members of a profession within the relevant field.​
  • Triangulation may refer to the triangulation of data through utilizing different instruments of data collection, methodological triangulation through employing a mixed-methods approach, and theory triangulation through comparing different theories and perspectives with your own developing “theory” or through drawing from a number of different fields of study.
  • Extended Field research, has a large extent, area, scope, degree, etc. vast. field studies or fieldwork is the collection of raw data outside a laboratory, library, or workplace setting. The approaches and methods used in field research vary across disciplines.
  • For example, biologists who conduct field research may simply observe animals interacting with their environments, whereas social scientists conducting field research may interview or observe people in their natural environments to learn their languages, folklore, and social structures.
  • Field research involves a range of well-defined, although variable, methods: informal interviews, direct observation, participation in the life of the group, collective discussions, analyses of personal documents produced within the group, self-analysis, and results from activities undertaken off- or online, and life-histories.
  • Although the method generally is characterized as qualitative research, it may (and often does) include quantitative dimensions.

Additional Information

  • Random assignment enhances the internal validity of the study because it ensures that there are no systematic differences between the participants in each group. This helps you conclude that the outcomes can be attributed to the independent variable.
  • For example, if doctors want to know whether a medication causes patients to be cured, they will do a random assignment study in which the experimental group gets the medication and the control group does not. Patients are chosen randomly, through a lottery, to decide who will be in the experimental group.

Related Questions

In cross-validation, what is the main drawback of Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation (LOOCV) compared to k-fold cross-validation?